Pederasty

The Welfare of Children

 

Outside the question of containing deadly diseases, the most immediate and important threat we face is to the welfare of our children.

Radical gays and lesbians openly admit their ultimate aim is young fresh flesh. One lesbian author, Patricia Warren has frankly predicted, "Whoever captures the kids owns the future." Little children’s minds will be thus indoctrinated in the coming battle-ground of a sexual culture war.

Frightening incursions by gays and lesbians into schools in American, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and elsewhere is already evident.

 

The natural attraction between girls and boys has been so confused by public celebration of homosexuality and the various eroticisms of everyday life, that young people are now confused about something as simple and basic as heterosexual identity. The result is that health professionals in the USA are reporting more kids are doing worse things at a younger age.

Twelve year olds are getting together for group oral and anal sex parties.

 

Indeed, Boston City Hall has a long history of financially supporting the Boston Youth Pride, currently $850,000 with a prom inside City Hall. The event is sponsored by the Boston Alliance of Gay, Lesbian, Transgendered Youth, and children as young as 12 attend. Some youths feature cross dressers who engage in heavy homosexual petting and drug use. The event is run by middle-aged gay men and lesbians which includes prominent transsexual adults who specialise in recruiting youths. Several adult homosexuals wore T-shirts with “Recruiter” written in rainbow colours and Mr Boston Leather acted as a doormen handing out business cards inviting youths to bondage and masochism sessions at his privately run Kinky Kamp.

 

How long is it before Youth Pride events are held closer to home?

Peter Tatchell, now darling of the British Police since Pride 2005, has long called upon the government to allow schools to teach teenagers the advantages of mutual masturbation and oral sex. Astonishingly, that's exactly what's come about!

In its attempt to reduce adolescent pregnancies; the highest in Europe, and the ever-increasing prevalence of teenage sexual diseases; the government has now approved a syllabus that concentrates on non-penetrative sex in sex education classes. Moral, emotional and psychological considerations will be swept aside and the value of true relationships will be ignored.

This will result in greater sexual experimentation by teenagers that will add to their confusion and uncertainty.

In addition, in 2005 the government expects local education authorities to impose new guidelines that will expose school children to information on homosexuality. Little surprise they sneaked the instructions out surreptitiously on Christmas Eve. The rationale for this is to combat homophobia, but the real effect will be to promote homosexuality. At last, because it inhibited what is now happening, the gay lobby are delighted with the removal of Section 28!

It was announced in January 2006 that children, some as young as seven, are be taught gay history and other homosexual related topics during a Gay History month in February. This follows a campaign run by Sue Sanders, a lesbian activist who works as a diversity teacher for the Metropolitan Police and Paul Patrick, a former teacher and contributor to the Trotskyist Socialist Worker newspaper. The Schools Out organisation of homosexual teachers back them.

Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Sir Ian Blair, who actively promotes ‘gay right’ has appointed 24 diversity advisers on £35,000 salaries. He has contributed £3,125 to the schools campaign. Education Secretary, Ruth Kelly has contributed another £20,000 and the Department of Education is backing the scheme. This puts pressure on school heads to take notice.

Lynette Burrows accused the organisers of ‘peddling poison’ and distorting history. The scientific and historical evidence is on her side.

At an education conference homosexual Stephen Twigg MP, then labour Schools Minister, stated it is '...not enough' for schools merely to promote homosexuality. They are admonished to a 'celebration of diversity encouraging differences of sexual orientation...' This is a major shift of extreme importance because it truly exposes the gay agenda that wants to encourage homosexuality in our children. Another means of ‘encouraging differences of sexual orientation.’ Young school children will be taught the graphic and sordid details of queer sex and be involved in role playing in pretend gay families.

 

Homosexual lobby groups associated with education intend to infuse the school curriculum with gay history, gay social science and gay literature. It will result in the social indoctrination and manipulation of children into an alternative unhealthy lifestyle through sexual experimentation that will ultimately prove problematic.

 

A Government quango, the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, thinks that children as young as five should be taught about homosexual lifestyles and divorce. Parents need to respond to this creeping pressure if they are to protect their children. Children in local authority care or with same-sex parents will not be preserved from this influence. Moreover, now comes a demand in 2006 from the National Union of Teachers that children as young as three should have lessons in homosexuality. They appealed to the Department of Education, ‘It is particularly important to begin to make three to five-year-olds aware of the range of families that exist in the UK today, families with one mum, one mum and dad, two mums, two dads...’
 

As one celebrated gay Canadian candidly put it, homosexuals are going to ‘diddle’ with their little minds.

One clear consequence of this radical ideology in our schools will be to undermine the adaptive masculine and feminine position which creatively bonds to enhance progeny. Thus, the complimentary male and female role will be undermined.. The term mother or father will become dirty words.

 

Indeed, in January 2008, Ed Balls, then Schools Secretary, formally launched guidance to schools by Stonewall, that did exactly that. Kids aged 4 to 7 are to be told that the phrase Mum or Dad are to be banned from classrooms under Government rules to stamp out gay bullying. Teachers have been told not to use the “gender specific” words to pupils. Schools are also advised to stop telling little boys to “be a man” or that they are behaving like “a bunch of girls”. Preferably ‘partners’ are the order of the day. They will be instructed in homosexual and lesbian arrangements. Children aged 11 to 14 are to be taught about same-sex partnerships. This is to be done on the premise it will reduce homophobic bullying at school. But in truth, it is really not about that. It’s about recruiting young minds to a radical alternative to the traditional family. Undoubtedly, it will confuse others.

 

Less than a year earlier, the Scottish National Health Service decided to become ‘LGBT-friendly’ by issuing directives to workers to halt any and all uses of ‘father,’ ‘mother,’ ‘husband,’ ‘wife’.
 

Should we be surprised to learn of a ‘cuddle puddle’ in American High Schools where girls pet girls. Exploring their sexuality school kids are coining new terms to describe themselves as polysexual, ambisexual, pansexual, polyfide, bi-curious, bi-queer, fluid , metroflexible, heteroflexible or simply heterosexual with lesbian tendencies..

The American National Center for Health Statistics claim that eleven percent of 15 - 19 year-old-girls are or have been involved in same-sex experiences, but one leading professor believes the true figure to be about twenty percent.

 

The Downside

 

What are the potential consequences for our school children?

Well, two extensive studies were published in 1999 in the American Medical Association's Archives of General Psychiatry confirm a strong link between homosexual sex and suicide as well as a relationship between homosexuality and abnormal mental problems.

A study using 103 pairs of twins, one a practicing homosexual and the other not, found that homosexual behaviour significantly increased the likelihood of suicide even after adjustments were made for substance abuse and depression. The practicing homosexual twin was over 5 times more likely to experience the suicidal symptoms. The study conducted by Richard Herrell et al. measured suicide risk in terms of the categories: "wanted to die," "suicidal ideation," "attempted suicide," and "thoughts about death." The study was unique for its thorough co-twin control design and its use of the most widely used instrument in psychiatric epidemiology, the Diagnostic Interview Schedule.

The second study - Is sexual orientation related to mental health problems and suicidality in young people by David M. Ferguson and his team found that "gay, lesbian, and bisexual young people are at increased risk of psychiatric disorder and suicidal behaviors." The youth suffering from these disorders were 4 times as likely as their peers to suffer major depression, almost three times as likely to suffer generalized anxiety disorder, nearly 4 times as likely to experience conduct disorder, 5 times as likely to have nicotine dependence, 6 times as likely to suffer multiple disorders, and over 6 times as likely to have attempted suicide.

The study was based on a 21-year longitudinal study of a birth cohort of 1265 children born in Christchurch, New Zealand. Of 1007 subjects questioned only twenty-eight (2.8%) were classified as being gay, lesbian, or bisexual.

The Sexual Orientation Regulations outlaw any ‘homophobic’ discrimination. The Department for Education and Skills already recommend some ‘anti-homophobia materials and gay right groups will want to expand their pressure on schools. For children aged from five upwards, Government departments recommend 12 books including ‘Daddy’s Roommate’, ‘Hello Sailor and ‘The Sissy Duckling’. Among the four books recommended for secondary-aged children is the sexually explicit novel ‘Strange Boy’, in which a ten-year-old boy has a sexual relationship with a 14-year-old boy. The end result will be that schools will be compelled to teach about gay sex and to treat homosexuality as the norm.

 

Some children have no moral compass and are afraid of being labeled as homophobic in a culture which, at every turn, encourages homosexuality as the norm.

 

Gay Labour

 

Reflect for a moment on the 1985 ‘Labour Gay Rights Manifesto’ It is a direct threat to traditional family life and the welfare of our children for it states:-

‘'Children grow up under the power of their parents. As children, any behaviour which is obviously sexual in adult terms is repressed… A socialist society would supersede the family household… Gay people and children should have the right to live together… Children and young people should have the right to determine their own sexual lives… Marriage should be disestablished… Women need access to free contraception and abortion facilities; this applies just as much to young women as to 'adults.' Children should be able to divorce their parents… It follows from what we have already said that we favour the abolition of the age of consent.'

 

Some would argue that a paedophile couldn’t have put a better manifesto for children!

If you consider this extreme, then reflect for a moment on the fact that most of what is advocated has come about? Under current legislation the State now supersedes the family. Social Workers have more de facto control over children then parents. Free contraception and abortion is on hand for schoolgirls irrespective of the wishes of the parents. Health clinics within schools now issue free condoms or the morning-after pill. Measures are in place that allow children to reject their parents in favour of the State. Conventional marriage is under threat from the so-called gay marriage arrangements. The age of consent for children to indulge in sexual activity, either straight or gay, has been lowered but not yet abolished. A consequence of this is that we now have more deeply troubled children whose lives are comprehensively impoverished.

It is now possible for gays and lesbians to adopt children. This despite the overwhelming scientific evidence that it can prove harmful to the child. It’s quite ironic, but individual members of British adoption panels could be accused of bigoted homophobic discrimination if they chose a heterosexual couple instead of a homosexual couple. Thus, real discrimination is reversed against heterosexual people.

Teenager Turmoil

 

What, you might ask, is the evidence for teenager turmoil? Well, we have unprecedented rates of family breakdown, of lone-parenting and mushrooming welfare dependency by both the needy and greedy, the deprived and depraved, increasing school failure, indiscipline, anti social behaviour, drug abuse, mental breakdown, teenager violence and delinquency, homelessness, exploding teenager venereal disease and growing rates of teenager pregnancy and the prison population is getting younger. The social consequences of all this is unprecedented and catastrophic.

Bog housing estates, the modern gulags of dependency and deprivation, are inhabited by inadequate bog parents who’s children attend bog schools which lack discipline, certainty and value, leading to welfare dependency, crime and incarceration, ill-health, self-harm, substance abuse, mental breakdown, suicide and early death.

With the current increase of teenage stabbings, anxious parents are kitting out their children with body armour clothing because of fears they will be attacked walking to and from schools already heavily reinforced against intrusion.. Slash-proof blazers and fleeces lined with body protective Kevlar and now commercially available.

 

Despite the fact the situation was bad under successive Tory governments, it is immeasurably worst since Tony Blair has come to power. At every turn the State has blindly failed and continues to do so. We are an ignorant and cruel senior generation that has failed to understand that parental permissiveness is leading increasingly to childhood repression and anxiety. Little wonder they are angry? The Government throws money at problems hoping they will go away and by doing so leave the underlying causes untouched. So, for example, a 2008 report from King’s College, London, found that the Governments decade long £650 million push to cut youth crime has had, “...no measurable impact.”

Children’s Rights

 

The idea of ‘Children’s Rights’ is a deceitful misnomer, but the industry is expanding and is the source of growing power and financial gain for some. It’s impact, however, is minimal.

It’s interesting to note that it was homosexual paedophiles who first suggested the idea of ‘Children’s Rights’ back in the 1970’s. Paedophile activist Roger Moody was instrumental in setting up the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE) which gained the early support of the National Council for Civil Liberties until PIE was prosecuted and suppressed in 1982.

From that point, the ‘cause’ was pursued through respectful, enlightened, progressive, scientific research bodies and professional pressure groups. The first of which was The Children’s Legal Centre coordinated by one Peter Newell. Newell is not a paedophile but has a track record of pushing radical Left-wing ideas about the family and children’s rights with the financial backing of major charitable trusts. He is, or has been involved in at least fourteen such organisations over the years and is assisted by his partner, Rachel Hodgkin, the mother of his four children.

Paedophiles knew they would never get anywhere arguing for the right to have sex with kids. So what they did was to approach the idea from a different deceitful angle. They specifically developed the ‘liberal’ idea of children having ‘equality’ rights that they could more easily exploit once established.

Thus, homosexuality, extreme feminism and radical socialism conflate to bring about a revolution that will change the very basis of our community - the demise of the traditional family. Our culture is blighted by postmodernism and the idea of moral equivalence in which anything goes.

Even gay pantomime Widow Twanky and now Gay Pride Patron, Sir Ian McKellen, who helped establish Stonewall to tackle Section 28, fully supports the infiltration of homosexual activists into the American Boy Scout movement ostensibly to challenge homophobia - the coded excuse for encouraging homosexuality.

 

Secret files maintained by the American Boy Scouts movement show they have ejected at least 5,100 adult scout leaders nationwide for sexual abuse allegations since 1946. And the files also reveal that despite efforts to keep potential abusers from joining, the problems persist. In the past 15 years alone, the organisation has kicked out leaders for such allegations at a rate of one every two days.

 

They have also had to contend for an inordinate time with the vexatious litigant, the American Civil Liberties Union, which keeps pushing the homosexual cause against the scouts movement. This powerful pro-homosexual pressure group has limitless funds to fight their claim that the scouts oath to God violates their rights.

 

Transforming Society

The social construct of society and our heterosexual culture is to be undermined! To quote the activist American law professor and executive director of the International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission Paula Ettelbrick recently, '...queer means pushing the parameters of sex and family, and in the process transforming the very fabric of society.' The objective of this minority group is clearly anti-democratic, if not totalitarian.

To suggest all gays have a fixated attraction for male children, or young men, is foolish. However, research repeatedly shows a disproportionate do! Studies show that heterosexuals molest most children generally. Gays are quick to point this out in order to conceal their behaviour. But the facts are against them! Homosexuals, as a defined group, are consistently and disproportionately over represented in male child molestation cases when compared with heterosexuals, as a defined group. Take, for example, the recent scandal of child sex abuse by 4,392 American Catholic priests. An inquiry found that eighty percent were homosexual paedophiles who debased young boys.

 

An inquiry into allegations of child sexual abuse by the Catholic Church revealed unmatched levels of abuse by the clergy on defenseless youth. Two recent findings show that between 1950 and 2002 more than 10,667 children were molested by 4,392 priests in an epidemic of sex abuse. Most were boys aged between 11 to 17. This involved between 4 and 7 percent of the US Roman Catholic clergy. Eighty percent were committed by homosexual priests and twenty percent by heterosexual paedophiles, some of whom were serial offenders. It is certain that the number of abuse cases was underreported and the amount of damages of $657 million considerably understated since 14 percent of the relevant dioceses were unable to provide figures.

 

Indeed, according to the Catholic Office for the Protection of Children, an average of one Roman Catholic priest every week was accused of sexual abuse in England and Wales in 2003, but none were prosecuted and all but two are still in their jobs. COPCA was set up by Lord Nolan who conducted an inquiry into abuse in 2001. He observed, 'Progress has been achieved at a time of continuing public awareness and concern about the handling of such issues by the Catholic Church, not only in England and Wales but also in Ireland, America, Canada and Australia.'

 

English professor Karla Jay, Ph.D., and well-educated journalist Allen Young, both homosexual activists, conducted the first major survey on homosexuality in America in 1979. Their work is still cited in academic studies and involved over 5,000 homosexuals from all walks of life. Titled "The Gay Report," the study published data on underage sex, disease, gross promiscuity, suicidal tendencies and more.

 

One cannot help but applaud the honesty of these two homosexuals in publishing the results of their study, which documented that "23 percent of respondents admitted to having had sex with youths aged 13-15, while 19 percent felt positive about sexual activity within this age group." Tragically, 50 percent of the males in their survey experienced their first sexual encounter at age 15 or less.

In spite of the fact that two gay researchers produced "The Gay Report," radical homosexual activists dismiss it as outdated. This is ironic considering they so often cite the much older 1948 "10 percent of society is gay" statistic from the oft-disputed Alfred Kinsey study.

 

But out of courtesy for their concerns, are there other esteemed elites drawing the same conclusions? Contrary to the homosexual assertion that heterosexual molestations outnumber those committed by homosexuals, Yale and Harvard-connected psychiatrist Jeffrey Satinover states that "careful studies show that pedophilia is far more common among homosexuals than heterosexuals." Satinover adds, "The greater absolute number of heterosexual cases reflects the fact that heterosexual males outnumber homosexual males by approximately 36 to 1. Heterosexual child molestation cases outnumber homosexual cases by only 11 to 1, implying that pedophilia is more than three times more common among homosexuals."

 

Current research by Professor Gene G Abel of Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons reveals that on average 150.2 boys are molested per homosexual paedophile offender, whereas only 19.8 girls are molested per heterosexual paedophile. Incredibly, homosexual offenders admitted between 23.4 and 281.7 acts of molesting boys.

Here, for example; are some notable research findings

•  Homosexual Alfred Kinsey, the so-called preeminent sexual researcher in the history of sexual research, found in 1948 that 37 percent of all male homosexuals admitted to having sex with children under 17 years old.

 

 •  A very recent (2000) study published in the Archives of Sexual Behavior found that "The best epidemiological evidence indicates that only 2-4% of men attracted to adults prefer men. In contrast, around 25-40% of men attracted to children prefer boys. Thus, the rate of homosexual attraction is 620 times higher among pedophiles."  

 

•  Another 2000 study in the Archives of Sexual Behavior found that". . . all but 9 of the 48 homosexual men preferred the youngest two male age categories" for sexual activity;' These age categories were fifteen and twenty years old.

 

•  Yet another recent study in the Archives of Sexual Behavior found that "Pedophilia appears to have a greater than chance association with two other statistically infrequent phenomena. The first of these is homosexuality . . . Recent surveys estimate the prevalence of homosexuality, among men attracted to adults, in the neighborhood of 2%. In contrast, the prevalence of homosexuality among pedophiles may be as high as 30-40%."  

 

•  A 1989 study in the Journal of Sex Research noted that " . . . the proportion of sex offenders against male children among homosexual men is substantially larger than the proportion of sex offenders against female children among heterosexual men . . . the development of pedophilia is more closely linked with homosexuality than with heterosexuality."  

 

•  A 1988 study of 229 convicted child molesters published in the Archives of Sexual Behavior found that 86% of pedophiles described themselves as homosexual or bisexual.

 

•  In a 1984 Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy article, sex researchers found that "The proportional prevalence of [male] offenders against male children in this group of 457 offenders against children was 36 percent."

 

•  Homosexual activists Karla Jay and I Allen Young revealed in their 1979 Gay Report that 73% of all homosexuals I have acted as "chicken hawks" — that is, they have preyed on adolescent or younger boys.  

 

•  In a 1992 study published in the Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, sex researchers K. Freud and R. I. Watson found that homosexual males are three times more likely than straight men to engage in pedophilia, and that the average pedophile victimizes between 20 and 150 boys before being arrested.  

 

•  A study by sex researchers Alan Bell and Martin Weinberg found that 25% of white homosexual men have had sex with boys sixteen years and younger.

 

Indeed, a significant minority of gays ultimately attest their introduction to the lifestyle by the predatory activity of mature homosexual men. This fact is consistently demonstrated over time and in separate surveys throughout the world.

And an unbiased reading of homosexuality history reveals the centrality of youth to its bizarre, chaotic customs. So, is there a link between the rise of gay culture and a global explosion of Internet interest in child pornography?

 

Do we have any evidence here of a connection between homosexuality and paedophilia?

 

Gays with Power to Manipulate

 

Judge the recent events concerning Liam Lucas, 29, with Social Services in London. He was just one of the many children, falsely branded as gay, who were abused by predatory paedophiles who took advantage of far-Left Islington Council’s childcare policies in the Eighties and Nineties, when it pro-actively recruited gay social workers. Lucas suffered twenty-years of abuse.

 

During school holidays Lucas was fostered by a man later imprisoned for abusing another child in his care. When he was nine, Islington placed him in its children's home in Grosvenor Avenue, run by two single males. Both were eventually accused of abuse but escaped investigation by moving to Thailand.

 

In 2003 when Margaret Hodge MP was made Minister for Children by Tony Blair, many people were aghast!

 

She had led Islington council from 1982-1992 and spectacularly failed to deal with a paedophile/pederast ring of council workers systematically abusing children in care - even to the point of running child brothels. Hodge, confirmed her incompetence by blaming her officials and said she knew nothing of the many child-centred claims of sexual abuse. When council leader, she also denounced media attention and inquires as Right-wing “gutter journalists” who had bribed children to lie. Some social workers were adamant she was informed about the abuse.

 

The police believed that several Islington workers acted a major procurers of children for abuse, exploitation and pornography.

Indeed, years later when the sexually abused story of Demetrious Paton surfaced, Hodge used her ministerial position to prevent the BBC from airing any details. By then Paton had a degree in philosophy and was studying for his MBA, but Hodge branded him as “...an extremely disturbed person”. This cost her an open apology and a contribution to charity of £10,000 and the story was aired.

 

Alarmingly, evidence is now emerging of a sinister paedophile connection with the current police investigation at the Haut de la Garenne children’s home in Jersey. More than 200 children who once lived there in the Sixties now describe horrific sexual and physical abuse. And so far, 100 charred bone fragments and 65 milk teeth have been found in the former children’s home.

 

Pederasts in Islington exploited the Councils' well-intentioned commitment to equal opportunities and soon most of Islington's 12 children's homes had child molesters on the staff who cynically pretended to be ordinary homosexuals. Numerous children and other staff made allegations of abuse, but they were ignored and branded homophobes.

 

A lengthy investigation by the London Evening Standard, resulted in a government inquiry, but at least 26 members of Islington social services staff, despite being accused of grave offences, were simply allowed to resign, often with glowing references.

 

Subsequently, the Thai police charged former deputy head, Nick Rabet, 57, with serious sexual offences against 30 Thai boys, the youngest six years old. He escaped trial by killing himself. It was later discovered that his Sussex children’s centre was partly financed by convicted child pornographers and that he was part of a ring of wealthy well-connected child-molesters

 

Peter Righton, former Director of Education at the National Institute for Social Work, had for many years openly advocated sex with boys in care. Evidently, he got away with it and influenced social workers to this day, because they feared seeming ‘homophobic’ by challenging him. Police later discovered he was a founder member of the notorious Paedophile Information Exchange that had campaigned for the age of consent to be reduced to four.

 

Of course this may be considered a long time ago and that similar cases are not being repeated today. Well, two men who became Yorkshire’s first gay foster carers were jailed in June 2006 for abusing four young boys placed in their care by Wakefield Council. Ian Wathey, 41 and Craig Faunch, 32, were sentenced to five and six years. The couple had been heralded as pioneers due to their willingness to foster the regions most troubled youngsters. Both men denied all allegations in a two-week trial. Although Social Services had strong reason to curtail the fostering process they neglected to do so out of fear of being labelled as homophobic.

 

Similarly, in September 2007, two homosexuals who had earlier hatched a plan to babysit a little boy in order to molest him were sentenced to lengthy prison terms. James Rae, 34, a mannequin-dresser, together with his ten-year lover, former soldier Alan Howitt, 39, were caught and tried at Reading Crown Court for numerous offences on a young boy when he was between the age of six-months and four-and-a-half years old.

 

The child had been repeatedly sexually abused over a four-year period forcing him repeatedly to have oral sex. Howitt, the ringleader, admitted three additional charges of indecent assault, to distributing indecent material involving children, an assault by penetration and perjury.

 

Other than the local press, these harrowing events went unreported.

 

Children’s Homes and Abuse

However, the UK's largest inquiry into abuse in children's homes resulted in only a handful of criminal prosecutions. The inquiry into the sexual abuse of children at care homes in North Wales revealed the ‘appalling mistreatment’ of child-victims over a period of some 20 years during the 1970’s and 1980’s. Twenty-eight former care workers, six of whom were convicted child abusers, were named in the Waterhouse Report.

The Waterhouse Tribunal (2000) - the largest child abuse inquiry ever set up in the UK - heard evidence from hundreds of victims. The tribunal was established following decades of disquiet over the children's home care system in North Wales. The 500,000-word report by former High Court judge Sir Ronald Waterhouse contained 95 conclusions and made 72 recommendations. Social workers, care home staff, local authorities and the Welsh Office were all severely criticised.

In all, Sir Ronald Waterhouse and his two fellow tribunal members heard evidence from 650 people who had been in care in north Wales since 1974.
 

Lost in Care - the report of the Waterhouse inquiry into child abuse in children's homes in North Wales - recommended a massive overhaul of the care system after uncovering a paedophile ring that targeted hundreds of young people in care in the 70s and 80s.

Commenting on the report, Prime Minister Tony Blair told the House of Commons: ‘It is an appalling situation and an appalling catalogue of terror and tragedy inflicted on some of the most vulnerable children in our society.’ He pledged to introduce tougher safeguards in the running of care homes.

Over recent years the gay lobby has sought four major advances. First, that of equality and the de-criminalisation of all sodomy laws. Second, gay marriage and adoption which is now formally enshrined in law. Third, a reduction in the age of consent for lawful teenager sexual activity and fourth, the removal of Section 28 which prohibited local councils from advocating homosexuality. By any standard what they have achieved is quite remarkable. Note however, it is no accident that three of their demands involve children.

Parents in traditional families have yet to fully understand what is happening to their children!

A homosexual pressure group identified with the ‘No Outsiders’ project (2008) are currently working with academics from Sunderland and Sheffield universities. Their aim is to bring information on the pleasures of gay sex to primary school children as young as five. They already operate in 14 primary schools. They are supported by the Economics and Social Research Council with funding of £600,000 of public money.

 

Critics say that teaching homosexual propaganda is now possible following the repeal of Section 28 which formerly served to curtail it. Most parents are woefully ignorant of this insidious incursion into the educational system.

In spite of its devastating potential, the Government foolishly thinks that homosexuality is equal, if not superior, to our time-honoured way of life. They are encouraged in this by a medical profession that quietly ignores a uniquely damaging sexual revolution of significant magnitude. The likely scale and depth of this change is without historical precedent. We are condemning future generations to sexual confusion and ambiguity which will result in dreadful dysfunction, dependence, despair and derogation.

Our political leaders show great concern for the nations health when it comes to smoking and want it banned as much as possible from public life, yet foolishly encourage a homosexual life-style which is more damaging to our health and infinitely worse for the fabric of our society. This is an unimagined contradiction and manifest folly of major proportions.

 

Tatchell’s Homophobic Trick

 

Unsurprisingly, the homophobic concept is based on questionable American research in 1996 by Professor Henry E Adams et al., which suggested some heterosexual men are aroused by gay pornography. It deserves close scrutiny.

 

This uncertain research is given prominence on many gay websites. Interestingly, campaigner Peter Tatchell refers to these findings on his 'Bigots are Buggers' webpage to suggest that 80% of homophobic men have secret homosexual feelings. He highlights this evidence during school lectures to counter criticism of homosexuality. Those schoolchildren who disapprove are then labelled as latent homosexuals. It is a neat but devious device for silencing opposition and suppressing rejection.

 

But the findings do not suggest that 80% of homophobic men have secret homosexual feelings. Tatchell has disingenuously read this into the report. The 80% figure relates strictly to the question of erectile 'arousal' and not homosexual feelings. There's a world of difference between the two. But Tatchell also conveniently ignores a very serious question about the validity of this study.

 

A competing theoretical explanation exists which Doctor Adams accepts! What was measured was not tumescent sexual 'arousal' but 'anxiety' - a function of the threat condition.

 

In a subsequent press release the American Psychological Association concluded these competing notions should be evaluated by future research. This reflected the ambiguity of the findings but so far no such research has been undertaken. This is probably due to the impossibility of objectifying the heavily subjective concept of ‘homophobia’ that is trapped in a conceptual minefield. Little wonder then that Adam's 'index of homophobia scale' has been abandoned confirming there is not such thing as clinical homophobia.

 

Recent methodologically sound and empirically grounded research by Professor Michael Bailey et al., Northwestern University (2002), challenges the Adams conclusions. Bailey concludes that, 'Sexual arousal is category-specific in men; heterosexual men are more aroused by female than by male sexual stimuli, while homosexual men show the opposite pattern.' Since this rigorous research contradicts another homosexual shibboleth, it is fair to assume the gay lobby have good reason for ignoring it?

 

Late in 2010, Tatchell revamped his website and although he still draws strongly on the Adam’s study to support his case, all references to the school lectures have been conveniently removed.

 

A more balanced view of homophobia comes from a surprising source. The prolific American gay-rights advocate Edwin Decker has remarked that the phrase is another one of those words or phrases used to marginalize or squelch the voice of someone that disagrees with homosexuality. He finds this quite remarkable coming from a group that, '...knows all about the horrors and the dangers and the heartbreaks of an exclusive society.'

 

He cogently observes, 'First of all, calling someone a homophobe because they don't agree with, say gays in the military is no different than calling someone 'unpatriotic' because they don't agree with war, or calling someone a 'racist' because they want tighter borders, or labelling me a spawn on Satan because I don't happen to believe the Mount Soledad Cross belongs on public property.'

Professional Pediatricians under attack

The concept of best practice is slowly being eroded by children’s panel throughout the country who are concerned with adopting children.. The law allows homosexual couples access to vulnerable children, an idea brought about through dubious research and political correctness. It proved too much for Paediatrician Dr Joy Holloway, a practicing Christian, who was employed as a Medical Adviser to the Newcastle Social Services Adoption Panel since 1985. By 1990 the Adoption Panel were under pressure to permit homosexual couples to adopt in spite of a Department of Health consultation paper of the same year stating, ‘...gay rights policies have no place in fostering services However, agencies up-and-down the country were quietly doing so.

In 1999, Dr Holloway entered into correspondence with Margaret Asquith, the then head of Children’s Services, objecting to the placement of vulnerable children with homosexual couples. Within weeks Holloway was excluded from the Fostering Panel and six months later was removed from the Adoption Panel, her place being given to another less qualified paediatrician.

Doctor Holloway subsequently publish a research paper entitled ‘Homosexual parenting: does it make a difference? A re-evaluation of the research with adoption and fostering in mind.’ She properly questioned the rigour and methodology of much research that was taken to support gay adoption and convincingly demonstrated the various harmful effects of adoptions by lesbians in which children suffered.

Similarly, in 2009 Doctor Sheila Matthews faced the same dilemma when working for the Adoption Panel in Northamptonshire. Working with parents and children, she was a community paediatrician with 18 years service. She had been working with the panel for 5 years and was a doctor of some 28 years experience. She made it formally known that she objected to same-sex parenting and asked to be excused those rare cases when they arose. She observed, “Using my professional judgement and having done a lot of reading around the subject, I am satisfied that there are research findings which support my position that a same sex partnership is not the best setting to bring up children.” Martin Pratt, Head of Service for Children arbitrarily removed her from the panel.
 

Children and Gender Dysphoria

 

In the UK about 90 children a year are treated for gender dysphoria - the desire to be the opposite sex. The youngest, a boy of 10 is currently undergoing therapy in preparation for a sex change when 18. Former specialist in gender reassignment, Dr. Peter Saunders, argues 'There is no biological or physiological basis for transsexuality. ...It's like anorexia. An anorexic believes they're fat when they're not, but it leads them to believe they need to lose weight.' About a third of the children who get transgender counselling go on to have a sex change. Paulina Reyes, a clinical psychotherapist remarks, 'Some parents want to believe there must be a medical reason for their child wanting to be the opposite sex. ...Often the tests will show that the children have no hormonal imbalance and their bodies are developing as they should be.'

 

In Australia, a young girl of 13 has successfully appealed to the High Court in order to start the gender assignments procedures so she can become a boy. John Fleming, director of the Southern Cross Bioethics Institute said, 'I find it to be an extreme misuse of surgery and medicine to treat a psychological condition in this fashion. The condition is not being treated but the fantasy is being colluded with.'

 

More disturbing, perhaps, is the US case of six-year-old Hillie Baker. She threatened to kill herself unless she was allowed to transform herself into a boy. Three years later, Hal is now treated as a boy and plans are afoot for hormone treatment to stop breast development. Another American child, 11 year-old Kayla, now living as a boy called Kalden is also taking hormone treatment to stop breast growth. As soon as 'he's' able, testosterone treatment and a full sex change will follow.

 

A further child, five-year-old Dylan, is repulsed by the fact he has a 'willy' and for the last two-and-a-half years has said he wants to be a girl. These are distressing times that require urgent medical explanation. Why have such young children become obsessed with the complexities of transgender development?

 

Doctor Kenneth J Zucker, of the Child and Adolescent Gender Identity Clinic in Toronto, Canada, has examined current research on GID in boys and girls. He says that a survey of the current literature on GID indicates that 'parents do play a role in influencing patterns of sex-dimorphic behaviour but not in the simplistic way that social learning theorists expected.' Children with GID are often brought up in homes where 'tolerance and non-responsiveness was common. Encouragement of these behaviours seems to be more common than negative or discouraging reactions.'

 

He lists three possible reasons for this tolerance as: '1. parental values and goals regarding psychosexual development; 2. feedback from professionals that the behaviour is within normal limits and "only a phase"; 3. parental conflicts about issues of masculinity and femininity; and 4. parental psychopathology and discord, which leave the parents preoccupied and unresponsive to their child's behaviour.'

 

Dr. Zucker admits that there are complex social and ethical issues surrounding the politics of sex and gender in postmodern Western culture. He notes that the 'most acute ethical issue may concern the relation between GID and a later homosexual sexual orientation. Follow-up studies of boys who have GID that largely is untreated, indicated that homosexuality is the most common long-term psychosexual outcome.'

 

He observes that clinicians have an ethical obligation to inform parents of the relationship between GID and homosexuality. Clinical experience suggests that psychosexual treatments are effective in reducing gender dysphoria and that individual counselling and parental counseling are both effective methods of treating GID.

 

He points out that it is legitimate for parents to establish limits for their children on cross-gender behaviors. If not, the behavior is, in effect, being reinforced.

 

Children and adolescents who are resistant to psychosexual treatment may be candidates for early hormonal treatment but only after all other options have been exhausted. The clinician may consider two options: management of the condition until the child is 18 and can be referred to an adult clinic or the early institution of sex hormones.

 

 

 

 

Copyright      |      Contact us       |      Top       |      Next