History and Politics
 

Revulsion Pre-dates Christianity

The casual observer should ask why it is that history has denied the current state of impartiality and acceptance of homosexuality and opted instead for denunciation or even, at times, death? Gays blame all their woes upon the Christian religion.
 

Historical evidence, however, pre-dates the Judea-Christian tradition and can be traced to Ancient Samaria.
 

Indeed, Assyrian Laws c. 1450-1250 specifically outlawed men having sex with men. Even pagan Celtic Britain kept campers at bay! By 494 AD homosexuality was a capital offence under Emperor Valentinian and was further codified under the Byzantine Emperor Justinian in the 6th Century. Moreover, by 900 it became a civil crime throughout Europe under Charlemagne.
 

Throughout the annals of history, homosexuality has generally been shunned and reviled by civil society. For the most part, this has resulted from religious injunction as well as a fear of sickness and disease. Another reason is an inherent personal distaste for practices that were seen as unnatural. It should be observed there are deep-seated religious as well as cultural dimensions to this aversion. In recent times, the homosexual community have added a political dimension that seeks an egalitarian level playing field. Their ultimate aim is greater acceptance by the wider community and thus respectability.

 

In fact, the distaste for homosexuality is deep-rooted in human culture and can be found in societies very far removed from Judeo-Christian ethics. Pre-Christian, non-Christian, and even anti-Christian societies have placed homosexuality outside the bounds of the respectable. In Mao’s China it was a capital offence: Bao Ruo-wang’s Prisoner of Mao includes a grisly account of a homosexual being executed.

 

Roman respectability also excluded homosexuality: Julius Caesar had a passionate attachment to a male friend when young, but his minders covered it up when he went into politics. The notion that the ancient world was a freewheeling paradise of liberated gayness until those “mean-spirited” Christians stomped on it is nonsense. Even the Ancient Greeks scorned the man who “played the woman’s part.” Social disapproval of homosexuality plainly has more to it than just a strict reading of Leviticus.

 

The British—i.e. Celtic, pagan—Queen Boudicca, rallying her troops to rise against the occupying legions in AD 61, told them that the Romans were “men who bathe in warm water, eat artificial dainties, drink unmixed wine, anoint themselves with myrrh, and sleep on soft couches with boys for bedfellows.” We British have, most of us, overcome our aversion to warm water and soft couches, but a recent survey in Britain revealed strong public resistance to further encroachments on majority culture by homosexuals.

 

In spite of the claims of contemporary gay historians, homosexuality has always been controversial and has never flourished fully in total freedom from moral opprobrium. The world's major religions have never formally endorsed homosexuality except in recent times and then only to a limited degree.

 

How far have things changed today? For the first time since the enactment of Emperor Justinian's (C 527-565) legal code in the 6th century, Europe is free of laws that ban same-sex relationships. The code stated, ‘We admonish man to abstain from the aforementioned unlawful acts, that they may not lose their souls... So that the city not come to harm by reason of such wicked deeds.’ Quite remarkably, this has been achieved over the last fifty years when formerly two-thirds of European countries criminalised such arrangements. This is an astonishing transformation for a so-called persecuted minority group!

 

But now the historical mould is seemingly fragmenting. Behaviour that was once shunned as repugnant has become increasingly socially acceptable. Even some religious leaders currently embrace an open style of life that was formerly condemned as an abomination. Contemporary translators of the modern Bible have banished the word "sodomy" from their texts and a new anodyne versions of immoral practices have been reinterpreted to isolate its negative relevance and impact on gay lifestyles. This is being carefully orchestrated.

In England, the Buggery Act of 1533, supported by Thomas Cromwell, was enacted by the British Parliament under the reign Henry VIII which stated ‘Forasmuch as there is not yet sufficient and condign punishment appointed and limited by the due course of the Laws of this Realm, for the detestable and abominable Vice of Buggery committed with mankind or beast...’ This law survived in various forms until 1967, although it was amended in 1861 to substitute life imprisonment for the penalties of death and forfeiture of property.

 

Between 1828 and 1836 eight men in Britain were hanged for sodomy; four for bestiality. The last execution for sodomy took place in 1836 .

 

It has been suggested that gay cruising grounds and brothels first appeared in mid-seventeenth century London. Samuel Pepys, for example, recorded in his diary in 1663 that, ‘Sir J Jemmes and Mr Batter both say that buggery is now almost grown as common among our gallants as in Italy.’
 

In 1690 the Society for the Reformation of Manners was formed in Tower Hamlets to act as moral guardians in suppressing bawdy houses and profanity. Networks were established in each ward of the city of London. The first homosexual they accused was one Captain Edward Rigby who was tried for sodomy but acquitted in 1698. However, a society member felt he had cheated justice and took measures which ultimately compromised Rigby for a second time. On conviction he was sentenced to stand in the pillories in Pall Mall, in Charing Cross and in Temple Bar for three hours each day. He was also fined £1,000 and given 12 months goal. Whereupon he escaped to France and entered the enemy’s service as ‘second captain’ of the French man-of-war Toulouse. It is believed he took with him the secrets of a homosexual court circle consisting of some dozen members, including King William.

 

Emboldened, the Society threatened to reveal lowly sodomite places of abode and other scandalous haunts on pain of reform, which is what happened. Several cases were brought to court for a ‘beast-like confederacy among themselves for exercising this unnatural offense.’ Although the Society caught 100 sodomites in 1707, it was eventually to boast in 1710 that ‘...our streets have been very much cleansed from the lewd night-walkers and most detestable sodomites.’
 

Nevertheless the Society had prosecuted some 94,322 people, public support declined and it was eventually disbanded in 1727.

 

Evidence of homosexual subcultures across Europe emerged around 1700. The patronilles de pederastie, or pederasty patrol of the Paris police identified the existence of a queer subculture in parks, streets and taverns to such an extent that by 1725 they had compiled a list of some 20,000 sodomites.

 

Oscar Wilde

 

Oscar Wilde (1845-1900), a gifted writer of considerable reputation is probably Britain’s best known homosexual. He was a person of rare talent which was cruelly affected by his bisexuality, homosexuality and pederasty. He had an insatiable desire for sexual encounters with working-class rent boys. This made him unhappy and he hoped that marriage would cure him. His downfall came, however, as a result of his relationship with Lord Alfred Douglas (Bosie), whose father, the Marquess of Queensberry - John Solto Douglas, was threatened by Wilde for a criminal libel because he had called him a sodomite.

 

The libel trial was a sensation and Wilde’s association with the Victorian underground of blackmailers, rent boys, cross dressers and gay brothels was made public. The prosecution collapsed near scenes of hysteria. Wilde was then arrested for acts of ‘gross indecency’ and later famously extolled the virtues of the ‘love that dare not speak its name.’ The jury were unable to reach a verdict and the trial ended.

 

In a final trial, Wilde was convicted of gross indecency and sentenced to two years hard labour. When released he went into exile in Paris whereupon he took up with his former habits enjoying notorious and uninhibited debauchery with the ‘little boys on the Boulevard.’ Thus. reflecting the lust that dare not speak its name. He was eventually reunited with Lord Alfred Douglas on the island of Capri, a haunt for homosexuals.

 

It was not until the Second World War that rapid and substantive changes came about in which homosexuals gained added freedoms.

 

The Grandfather of Gay Rights

The grandfather of the gay rights movement was a homosexual German lawyer named Karl Heinrich Ulrichs (1825-1895). He had been molested at the age of 14 by an older male tutor. In 1860 he devised a theory about a third sex of homosexuality in which he claimed the female were trapped in a male body. By the time he died, the homosexual movement had made great strides in Germany. In a letter to Karl Marx, Frederich Engels attested to their growing hidden strength.

When Ulrich died the homosexual movement split into two factions. Magnus Hirschfeld, another homosexual and a prominent Jewish physician followed Ulrichs theory and created the Scientific Humanitarian Committee in 1897 and later in 1919, the Institute for Sex Research in Berlin. He shunned pederasty and was the first to coin the phrase ‘transvestite’ for cross-dressers. Early research indicated that about 2.2% of German men were gay. According to Hirschfeld, roughly 20,000 boys were prostituted into Germany’s flourishing gay population.

By 1919, the Berlin Commissioner for Police identified some 100,000 homosexual men in the city. The research institute became a powerful organisation because by 1933 it contained more than forty-thousand intimate records, confessions and biographical letters of prominent members of the Nazi party. Because of this, it was later seen as a potential threat to the top echelons of the Nazi Party whose personal secrets were formally documented.

Adolf Brand who, with others, organised The Community of the Special (CS) led the other faction. Brand and his click were vicious sadistic misogynists who despised anything feminine and were appalled at the ‘fairies’ theory of homosexuality. Instead, they promoted the Hellenic ideal of the ultramasculine male supremacist homoerotic warrior devoted to man/boy sexual relations. In brief, a homoerotic brotherhood.

From early on then, there was real tension between those who were seen as ‘Femmes’ and those who followed Brand’s notion of predatory pederast ‘Butches’. However, it was the ‘Butches’ who later went on to dominate the gay movement and the Nazi party itself. This conflict helps explain the subsequent contradictory Nazi view of homosexuality itself.

The CS grew in strength through the Wandervogel (Rovers of Wandering Youths), a sort of Boy Scouts movement. It was dominated by pederasts who used it to recruit young boys. They were indoctrinated into Greek paganism and the movement formed the spearhead for the Nazi Party itself. This led to numerous other organisations culminating in the Nazi Brownshirts. The CS created the ‘Seig Heil’ salute.

One of the first central figures for the Nazis was Ernst Roehm, an infamous pederast with an unquenchable lust for young boys. He had been highly placed in the underground nationalist movement that plotted the overthrow of the Weimar government through assassinations and terrorism. Gerhard Rossbach, a sadist, murderer and homosexual, who had been involved in the Freikorps or Storm Troopers (SA) soon to become the Nazi Brownshirts had previously recruited him into homosexuality. Hitler became a protégé of Roehm and soon ascended to head the Nazi Party

Roehm viewed homosexuality as the basis for a new society and homosexuals were given many positions of power and influence within Nazi movement. Anyone who opposed the Nazis were beaten and Hitler believed this was best done by homosexuals.

By 1923, Roehm had recruited and trained some 2.5 million to 4.5 million Storm Troopers (SA) and Gestapo (SS), compared with about 1000,000 in the regular army. Once the SA was disbanded after the blood purge in 1934 most of the experienced homosexual leaders moved into powerful positions in the German military. The CS and SA were famous for their pederasitc activities.

In the 1920’s and 30’s homosexuality was known throughout the world as the German vice because of the debaucheries of the period. British homosexual Christopher Isherwood reminisced blissfully of the 1920’s Berlin boy brothels, ‘Berlin is for boys… The German Boy... Blond’ Berlin had become a coterie of Bohemian artists, sado-sexual transvestites, lesbians with homosexual nightclubs and baths, as well as the rampant control of Berlin by pornographers, organised crime and drug dealers. Nearly a million-and-half men and women were largely or completely homosexual and most were attracted by the Nazi principles and society

However, it should be noted that in spite of the fact that in 1933, Hitler banned pornography, homosexual bars and bath-houses and groups promoting gay rights, its purpose was primarily another means to eliminate political opponents, both inside and outside the party. As laws were adapted they tended increasingly to target not only their enemies but also the ‘Femmes’. It was from this group of homosexuals that some were sent to work camps rather than the death or concentration camps. Homosexuality continued to be informally tolerated to a remarkable degree.

Hitler’s Gay Roots

Circumstantial evidence suggests Adolf Hitler had been a male prostitute in Vienna from 1907 to 1912 and then in Munich from 1912 to 1914. Indeed, the Viennese police records listed him as a homosexual. Although decorated for bravery during the First World War, it seems he was not promoted because of his homosexuality. Later he became a masochistic coprophile (sexually aroused by human excrement). His hero was Frederick the Great another homosexual. It seems likely he had a sexually perverted relationship with four women, including his own niece. They all attempted suicide; two were successful.

Hitler’s book Mein Kampf (My Struggle), is outspoken in its hatred of Jews, Marxists, Negroes, Chinese, Arabs, Easter Europeans and women, He is entirely silent on the question of homosexuality . He venerated the archetypal super macho Aryan male, for whom women were seen to serve the role as breeders for the race of supermen. He was utterly contemptuous of the Judeo-Christian tradition. A contemporary of his, the radical sexologist Wilhelm Reich warned that the Nazi leadership was both ideologically and actually homosexual. He noted that leaders such as ‘Bluher, Roehm... Rosenberg represented Hitler’s fanaticism which was ‘...a male state organised on a homosexual basis.’

Hitler surrounded himself with homosexuals; in fact, his personal bodyguard were all gay, as were many of the leading Nazi’s of the time. His closest associates, Roehm and Rudolf Hess were homosexuals. Others in key positions included Bladur van Schirach as Hitler’s Youth Leader, Hans Frank his Minister of Justice, Willhelm Bruckner his adjutant, Walther Frank his Minister of Economy and, of course, his subsequent second-in-command Hermann Goering – a cross dresser who wore camp make-up.

Emile Maurice, one-time Hitler’s personal secretary was a homosexual, as well as the pornographer Julius Streicher who as a schoolteacher had been dismissed for molesting boys. SS Chief Heinrich Himmler was another known for his pederasitc proclivities, which was captured on film. Reinhard Heydrich, mastermind of the first pogrom, Kristallnacht and the death camps was homosexual. Even Joseph Goebbels was known for indulging in a degenerate homosexual orgy. Other scholars have identified a ‘homo-erotic’ relationship between Hitler and his architect Albert Speer.

Hitler declared he was most influenced by Jorg Lanz Von Liebenfels and referred to him as the father of German National Socialism. A former Cistercian monk, Lanz had been excommunicated for homosexuality. He went on to establish an occult order called the Ordo Navi Templi (ONT). It merged occultism and violent anti-Semitism. Lanz chose Wotan, the god of storms that became the inspiration of the Storm Troopers.

The Nazi nationalist dream was based on a homo-erotic theosophical cult called The Thule Society founded in 1917 by Lanz and Guido von List a radical misogynist and sexual pervert. The occult roots of the Nazi Party run deep into German history. Leading occult figures responsible for this legacy were homosexuals who propagated the supremacy of the Aryan Master Race and their justification for the vicious annihilation of ‘inferior’ life.
 

However, it has also been suggested that the true inspiration for the fascist state comes from Plato, the male supremacist and apologist for pederasty. For example, the ‘Father of National Socialism’ is considered to be Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche (1844-1900). He was rabidly anti-Christian and a homosexual. He contributed to the development of existential philosophy declaring ‘God is dead’. He felt women were only for breeding and sexual slaves and that men were bred for war. His philosophy was grounded in Greek and Roman paganism. He became a hero of the masses and was canonised in the popular media by German intellectuals. However, he went insane at the age of 44 and eventually died of syphilis contracted from a gay brothel in Genoa, Italy.

Before moving on, however, it is necessary briefly to mention five other historical concerns in the development of the Nazi regime which have relevance to the question of homosexuality.

 

Captain Ernst Roehm and a trusted homosexual cadre of Storm Troopers staged the burning of the Reichstag. They managed to recruit a degenerate Dutch moron named Van der Lubbe to do the job. Left to his own devices he was subsequently arrested. The purpose was to blame the Communist as much as it was to instill fear in the German people.

 

Ernst Rhoem and his Storm Troopers were also responsible for the burning of books at Hischfeld’s Sex Research Institute. This spectacular event is often replayed in newsreel footage. It was the culmination of sustained harassment by the Nazi’s despite the fact they had derived great profit from Hirschfeld’s theories and his professional help. For the sake of public safety, the institute cancelled all meetings. This organisation served as the headquarters of the ‘effeminate branch of the German homosexual culture and was deeply resented by Nazi supremacist Butch gays.

 

Importantly, the attackers had lists of materials they were looking for and besides destroying some twelve thousand books and thirty-five thousand photographs, they carted away two truckloads of books and files. The event was an attempt to cover-up the truth about rampant sexual deviancy and homosexual perversions within the Nazi party that could damage Hitler and his inner circle.

 

The Roehm purge or Night of the Long Knives is another issue of contention. It was driven by political and not moral concerns. It was not as some think an attempt by Hitler to rid himself of an embarrassing homosexual. Hitler had known Roehm for fifteen years and was intimately familiar as a close friend with his sadistic behaviour. Roehm, after all, had been his mentor. Hitler was fearful that the Wehrmacht (German High Command) might be plotting a coup against him. The assassins were mostly homosexual perverts or sex maniacs of one type or another and were organised by Reinhard Heydrich, also a well-known homosexual nick-named the ‘Blonde Beast’. Apart from Hitler, everyone feared him. About a thousand men were brutally murdered throughout Germany. Thus, the majority of the fascist homosexuals in the army remained unscathed.

 

Hitler subsequently lied in suggesting it was an act of moral cleansing and only feigned disgust and outrage as a way of allaying public suspicions about sexual deviancy within his inner circle. The assassinations relieved Hitler of two problems. First, the fear of an attempted a coup and second it also placated the Italian fascist Benito Mussolini who particularly loathed ‘il visio tedesco’. The Italians had warned Hitler earlier when in Venice about the political unreliability and moral rectitude of Roehm, Heines and Karl Ernst in particular. Within six months of the purge The Malicious Practices Act came into force which outlawed any remark likely to prejudice the welfare of the Reich. It was punishable by death and was intended to stifle rumours of Hitler’s homosexuality. The German public were effectively and quickly gagged.

 

Heydrich also orchestrated the massacre dubbed Kristallnicht (Crystal Night) because the streets were covered in broken glass. Many Jews were murdered and 7,500 business throughout German were destroyed. Jewish synagogues. cemeteries, schools and homes were destroyed. Ninety-six Jews were killed and 30,000 arrested and sent to the death camps.

 

Although well planned in advance, Heydrich exploited the assassination of Ernst vom Rath, a Councillor attached to the German Embassy in Paris. This murder was used as the cover to attack the Jews. Rath was another homosexual known within Parisian gay circles as ‘the ambassadress’ and ‘Notre Dame de Paris’. Rath had taken up with a 17 year-old gay Polish Jew who eventually shot him for breaking a promise not to transport his parents to the concentration camps.

 

Self-confessed Germanophile, British Consul-General R.T. Smallbones explained the violent outbreak of sadistic cruelty on ‘...sexual perversion, and in particular, homosexuality’. He went on, ‘I am convinced that this explanation [widespread homosexual perversion] is the correct one.’
 

Finally there is the question of the persecution of German homosexuals. Although laws were gradually drawn up to suppress homosexuality generally, they were used sparingly and in many cases required the highest authority for prosecution. Thus, most homosexuals had to publicly re-offend several times before being jailed and these were usually confined to the Femmes group of homosexuals. No surprise, perhaps, that revisionist gay historians should misrepresent the link between homosexuality and the Third Reich? The call by leading Nazi’s for the ‘eradication of homosexuals’ was merely propaganda meant for public consumption.

The fact is, that very few homosexuals died in the concentration camps, but about 5,000 were sent to work camps were some did die. It should also be noted that the Nazi regime often labelled enemies of the state as homosexuals as a means of sending them to the death camps. It is also true that some homosexuals were arrested, but this was for political and not moral purposes. It is well documented that many of the guards and administrators responsible for the infamous concentration camps atrocities were themselves homosexual. Many were out-and-out extreme violent sadists.

 

It has been variously claimed that there were between 2 and 6 million homosexuals in Germany during the period of the rise of Nazi’s. Similarly, it is said that between 5,000 and 15,000 homosexuals met their death, mostly in work camps, out of a total of some 100,000 who had been arrested. Of that group, some 50,000 were convicted and sentenced to regular prisons. However, it has to be stated that there is no known statistical evidence for the number of gays who died in the camps. Much of this, of course, undermines gay propaganda of massive persecution under Hitler’s regime.

 

Thus, millions of German homosexuals went relatively untouched throughout the twelve year period of the Third Reich. Most were regular Nazi soldiers, collaborators and even murderers.

 

The American Gay Movement

 

Evidence shows a clear association between the former Fascist homo-erotic movement and the American homosexual culture. For example, Allen Ginsberg, ‘beat poet’, homosexual/pederast gave evidence to the American Supreme Court in 1966. He was asked if there might in future be a party made up of homosexuals? He replied, ‘...this had already happened in a sense - or of sex perverts- and we can point to Hitler, Germany under Hitler.’
 

In fact the first gay-rights organisation in the USA was an American chapter of the German-based Society for Human Rights (SHR) formed in 1919. Many early prominent Nazi’s were members. The American SHR was formed in Chicago 1924 by a German/American soldier named Henry Gerber, who had previous close connections with the German gay movement. A year later, however, it collapsed when two leading members, including Gerber, were charged with sexually abusing a boy. The charges were, however, dismissed and Gerber went underground only to re-emerge in 1934 as a writer for a pro-homosexual magazine. He retained his ties to the German SHR, who published several of his articles. He passed his dream of an American homosexual movement to one of his young conquests, one Champ Simmons. He eventually as an adult homosexual passed it on to one of his sexual partners, a youth named Harry Hay. He died aged 80 in 1972, after he had seen the emergence of homo-fascism as a permanent theme in the gay movement.

 

The American Nazi Party was formed in 1959 by twice married George Lincoln Rothwell, a former Navy pilot. This group were riddled with homosexuals but questions remain about Rothwell’s sexuality, but another branch of the movement, the National Socialist White People’s Party, was openly gay and unique in restricting membership to homosexual Nazi’s. Rothwell was assassinated in 1967.

 

A decade later, Frank Collins headed a group of men in full Nazi regalia demanding a staged march through a Jewish quarter of Skokie, Chicago, home to many Holocaust survivors. Prevented at first, the march took place elsewhere and drew international condemnation. Collins was a convicted homosexual pederast, whose conviction in 1979 for indecent acts with two boys aged 10 and 14 led to a jail sentence of seven years.

 

Indeed, many in the American gay community are attracted to the glorification of Nazi imagery, styles, symbolism and icons. For instance, it has been estimated that most articles in the homosexual magazine, The Advocate, are replete with glorified Nazi dress and language, espousing contempt for ‘fems, fats’ and blacks. Nazi costume and fascist concepts are common. In fact, it has even been suggested that the American gay movement has adopted the terror tactics of the Nazi Brownshirts.

 

Harry Hay and the Mattachine Society

 

In 1948, following 18 years as an American Communist Party leader, Harry Hay organised the Mattachine Society. The aim was to promote homosexual interests. Hay was not a fascist, but a neo-pagan who practiced occult rituals in Aleister Crowley’s notorious anti-Christian group The Order of the Eastern Temple. Lesbians performed high priestess ceremonies. He supported the terror tactics of gay pressure groups but was never directly linked to them. He openly endorsed pederasty as a pivotal issue of the gay rights movement which explains why conventional gay groups shunned his company. He is acredited with being the American founder of the modern gay movement. He was another who had been sexually abused when young by an older homosexual.

 

About the same time Alfred Kinsey released his culture-shattering study Sexual Behaviour in the Human Male. It was tailor-made to support the homosexual pederast agenda for promiscuity and deviance. He declared that adult/child sex was harmless which was based on data gathered by paedophiles involving hundreds of masturbating experiments with children, some as young as 5 months old. His ‘study’ was to have massive consequences for the American way of life and it deeply permeated law, science, medicine, education and politics.

 

Current research, however, comprehensively repudiates Kinsey. He was not only a charlatan of the first order, he was also a sexual deviant. He was a compulsive/obsessive masochistic masturbator who compelled family and colleagues to indulge in sexual orgies involving homosexuals and lesbians. As for much of his sexual data on babies, it is likely some of this was obtained from Doctor Fritz von Balluseck who had performed sex experiments on holocaust children in the Nazi death camps.

 

Kinsey and Flawed Gay Research

 

Homosexuals frequently press the fact that in 1973, the American Psychiatric Association no longer declared homosexuality a mental disorder. At the time the APA were heavily influenced by the omni-sexual self-destructive and corrupt Zoologist, Alfred Kinsey. For most of his life he masturbated with a 'toothbrush' inserted in his urethra and circumcised himself with a pocket-knife without the benefit of any anaesthetic. He was a compulsive/obsessive masturbator. In a bizarre act of self-torture he tied a rope around his scrotum then jumped off a chair and suspended himself in midair. He was in hospital for four weeks and his injuries may have led to his death two years later. Judith Reisman has observed, 'An early adherent and advocate of masturbation, Kinsey suffered an untimely death due, at least in part, to "orchitis," a lethal infection in his testicles that followed years of sadistic, orgiastic "self-abuse." Kinsey's obsessive, brutally masochistic masturbation methods appear to have assisted in his early demise.'

 

It has long been known that Alfred Kinsey had more than a few skeletons in his closet - including scrupulously documented staff orgies, mandatory wife-swapping, and on-campus sadomasochism. Only recently, however, has his bizarre and dangerous life been fully revealed in all its sordid detail.

 

Kinsey's 'research' has now been proven to be fraudulent and manipulated by ideological bias, Nevertheless, at the time, it did provide the platform for reforming America's laws governing sexual conduct and sex crimes as well as changing attitudes toward traditional sexual mores. Kinsey advocated the abolition of all moral judgments pertaining to sexual conduct as he regarded sex as a mere biological drive devoid of any moral connotations. The Kinsey findings directly informed the American Penal Code eliminating and weakening 52 sex laws that once protected marriage and permitted the emergence of sex education in schools which allowed debate on abnormal sexual conduct. Sex education was comprehensively shifted.

 

He argued that morality was strictly the result of cultural conditioning and not representative of concepts like right and wrong, normal and abnormal, acceptable and unacceptable. His fraud was in promoting acceptance of homosexuality and paedophilia through flawed data furtively collected from prison inmates, prostitutes, known paedophiles and child molesters. Kinsey documented up to 2,035 children; some as young as 5 months old; in sex experiments which amounted to serious criminal assaults. Of all leading academic cognitive, learning and maturational theorists, Kinsey stands alone in arguing that sexual satisfaction was a childhood goal.

 

Subsequently his research was exposed as a massive fraud. Even data concerning child sexual arousal was obtained in great secrecy from a former World War II Nazi, Doctor Fritz von Balluseck. He had performed sex experiments, including rape, on holocaust children. Following the war Balluseck was tried for the murder and rape of a 10-year-old girl. During his trial it was discovered that he had been molesting children for more than 30 years including those under the occupation control of Nazi Germany In 1957 the German newspaper National Zeitung reported that the Nazis encouraged him to practice his abnormal tendencies in occupied Poland on children who had to choose between von Balluseck and the gas ovens. The German press denounced him as the worst sex criminal since the end of the war. At that time, the American press were silent about Kinsey's connection and his biographers steadfastly covered-up his devious involvement.

 

Today, The Kinsey Institute deftly deny that he knew von Balluseck was a former Nazi SS officer, and claims his information was not used. Even if true, it is clear that America's foremost sex doctor kept some very bad company indeed. But at his trial, von Balluseck admitted to Judge Berger that Kinsey had specifically asked him for the material about his perverse actions. The presiding judge was outraged by the collaboration with Kinsey stating that, 'Instead of answering his sordid letters, the strange American scholar should rather have made sure that Mister von Balluseck was put behind bars.' But back in America, Kinsey even defiantly obstructed the FBI in their inquiry.

 

However, much more difficult to explain away by those who support Kinsey, is the fact he used Rex King, a serial paedophile who abused 800 children in order to obtain evidence of sexual arousal. Despite this, supporters like Gore Vidal see Kinsey as... 'the most famous man for a decade,' and one who as advanced the homosexual and paedophile movement throughout the world.

 

The American Psychiatric Association

 

It is worth noting that only a third of the 30,000 American Psychiatric Association (APA) membership voted to change the definition following a mass mailing deception by the pro-homosexual faction funded by the gay lobby. The change was essentially a political/social one with no reference to medical science or psychiatry. The National Gay Task Force used trickery and threats to neutralize the APA with the help of internal homosexual activists. It was a secret pivotal role, financially and strategically. Two years later the American Psychological Association followed suit.

 

It was later found that the Research Council of the APA had not investigated the issue properly and the Nomenclature Committee had never formally approved the change and the de-classification had been achieved without the general membership ever fully knowing what was going on. Subsequently, in 1981,sixty-nine percent of psychiatrists disagreed to the change and still considered homosexual a pathological adaptation. Moreover, it was not until 1992 that the World Health Organisation removed homosexuality from its International Classification of Diseases. Thus, it appears the rest of the world doubted the APA 1973 decision for nearly two decades. Now influential voices within the psychiatric field consider the APA to be too politically correct, bureaucratic and too obeisant to special interests. Thus, its professional standing is harmed.

 

The gay lobby had another pressing consideration. The medical profession still referred to the Gay Related Immune Disorder (GRID) together with the other unequivocally homosexual related condition Gay Related Bowel Syndrome. This carried some very heavy negative images. It had the potential to reinforce public disapproval that would deligitimate future proposals for homosexual rights and privileges. The label stood in direct contradiction to any propaganda that upheld the virtue of homosexual life. And so pressure was swiftly generated to rename the disease into Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome AIDS. Thus one more prize was notched up and the 'gay plague' disappeared from the public perception and the homosexual life was a little more sanitized.

 

It was the homosexuals opening phase in the sexual radicalisation of society. The second phase, which has intensified today, was in raising homosexuality to the level of a ubiquitous alternative lifestyle, to make it desirable, normal, innate, unchangeable, respectable and even noble. Portrayed as a fulfilling and even healthy lifestyle, it deserved protection as a human right. Hence the current slogan, "Gay rights are human rights."

 

In recognising that homosexual behaviour was reclassified as normal, for purely political and not scientific reasons, we should not entirely exclude the idea of continuing to label same-sex attraction as a disorder. Essentially, homosexuals exploit their bodies in ways that nature did not intend. The behaviour is thus dysfunctional.

 

Same-sex attraction is a mental condition emanating from the socio/psychological development of a child. A surprising number of distressing behaviours can be traced to early childhood. It is necessary to appreciate that one can experience a psychological disorder and still outwardly function in society in an almost normal manner. For example, a person suffering from compulsive hoarding is unable to dispose of excess possessions. Material objects accumulate to the point were whole areas of the home are unusable, yet this same person may perform well at work. Friends who do not visit the home may have no idea there is a problem, Compulsive hoarding is extremely difficult to treat and hoarders themselves insist that do not need help and resist all assistance.

 

Researchers in America have concluded that there is an association between homosexuality and psychopathology and both converge on the same conclusion. Homosexual men and women are at substantially higher risk for some forms of emotional problems, including suicide, major depression, anxiety disorder, conduct disorder and nicotine dependence.

 

Doctor Robert Sptizer

 

It is also necessary to say something about the role of Doctor Robert Sptizer. Significantly, it was his reforming zeal and direct personal intervention that helped delete homosexuality from the American Psychiatric Association's manual of mental disorders back in 1973. Then he was a hero of the gay community, but not any more!

 

Now he is one of America's leading senior psychiatrists, a Professor of Psychiatry and Chief of Biometrics Research Department at the New York State Psychiatric Institute in New York. He has achieved international recognition as an authority in psychiatric assessment and the classification of mental disorders.

 

'Like most psychiatrists,' said Dr. Spitzer, 'I thought that homosexual behaviour could be resisted, but sexual orientation could not be changed. I now believe that's untrue - some people can and do change.' He also thinks that the mental health professions should cease their ban on therapy.

 

Presently he has completed research on 'reformed' homosexuals who through treatment have reverted to heterosexuality. Spitzer published a detailed review in 2001 entitled, 'Can Some Gay Men and Lesbians Change Their Sexual Orientation? 200 Participants Reporting a Change from Homosexual to Heterosexual Orientation.' He goes on to observe, 'Although initially sceptical, in the course of the study, the author became convinced of the possibility of change in some gay men and lesbians.' In his structured analysis of homosexuals who claimed to have changed their orientation through 'reparative therapy', he concluded that the therapy had been genuinely effective: that '...almost all of the participants reported substantial changes in the core aspects of sexual orientation, not merely overt behaviour'.

For those critics who say that attempts to change sexual orientation can cause emotional harm to homosexuals, he notes: 'For the participants in our study, there was no evidence of harm'. He specifically draws criticism of the medical professionals who deny the efficacy of therapy when he observes, 'Mental health professionals should stop moving in the direction of banning therapy that has as its goal a change in sexual orientation. Many patients can make a rational choice to work toward developing their heterosexual potential and minimising their unwanted homosexual attractions.'

 

Despite the 'scientific' criticism of the gay lobby that current therapy regimes lack scientific rigour or validity, thousands of homosexual men and women undergo successful rehabilitation each year resulting in fulfilling and productive lives as heterosexual human beings.

 

The Evelyn Hooker Study

 

Nevertheless, the major professional associations of mental health practitioners in the United States have maintained that homosexuality is not a mental illness. It's hardly surprising, then, that they should reject any idea or therapy and are highly critical of any attempt to change a persons sexual orientation, alleging such attempts are temporary and harmful. Indeed, 'gay science' instructs that homosexuality only became a mental health diagnosis as a reflection of prevailing social prejudice. This assumption was first questioned by Evelyn Hooker [See 'Flawed Homosexual Research' webpage], whose research was used to persuade the American Psychiatric Association in 1973 that homosexuality was not a pathology but a 'normal variant' of human sexual behaviour. It is said her work was the cornerstone for an entire body of research into homosexuality which has purportedly 'inspired' social scientists, mental health professionals, human rights activists and people around the world.

 

In tandem with the Kinsey findings, Hooker's study has proven to be pivotal for removing the mental disorder label. Indeed, such is her prominence in gay history that Division 44 of the APA (The Society for the Psychological Study of Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Issues) and the American Psychiatric Association holds her memory in especial esteem. It is both instructive and interesting, therefore, briefly to say something about Division 44 and Hooker's 'study' because this bring us up-to-date with the recent formal endorsement of gay-marriage by the APA in August 2004.

 

Evelyn Hooker's pivotal 1957 'research' into homosexuality is unsound in a number of ways. She failed to use a random sample and allowed gay activists to recruit homosexuals who best illustrated normality. Unstable gays were excluded. In fact, motivation for the study came from and was manipulated by gay activists from the Mattachine Society. This was the original gays rights group set up by the homosexual/paedophile and communist activist, Harry Hay in 1953. There is a difference and contradiction in her two accounts of how she obtained heterosexual subjects. Some subjects had engaged in sexual behaviour contrary to their normal sexual orientation. She made several mistakes in her mathematical calculations. She did not prove that homosexuals are altogether normal.

 

Her experience of the Rorschach test which she administered was inadequate. Most seriously, the homosexual subjects were unable to refrain from gay sexual fantasies in the TAT and MAPS test and for that reason she abandoned them. They could not help themselves from interjecting sexual significance where it did not, or need not exist. This finding does indeed point to a remarkable difference of attitude between homosexual and heterosexual men, thus reversing the popular claim about the study. Finally, Hooker had no clinical experience in the field of human behaviour. Her professional research was confined to rats.

 

The Rorschach Test

 

But what can we say about the reliability of the Rorschach test itself. Although still used by some professionals it has been abandoned by many because it is inherently problematic. In short, it's about as useful as interpreting head bumps, palm reading or Tarot cards. The Rorschach inkblot test is a psychological projective test of personality in which a subject's interpretations of ten standard abstract designs are analysed as a measure of emotional and intellectual functioning and integration.

 

Introduced in 1921 by the Swiss psychiatrist Hermann Rorschach, the test bears a charming resemblance to a party game. A person is shown ten inkblots and asked to tell what each resembles. Like swirling images in a crystal ball, the ambiguous blots tell a different story to every person who gazes upon them. There are butterflies and bats, diaphanous dresses and bow ties, monkeys, monsters, and mountain-climbing bears. When scored and interpreted by an expert, people's responses to the blots are said to provide a full and penetrating portrait of their personalities.

 

The scientific evidence for the Rorschach has always been feeble. By 1965, research psychologists had concluded that the test was useless for most purposes for which it was used. The most popular modern version of the Rorschach, developed by psychologist John Exner, has been promoted as scientifically superior to earlier forms of the test. In 1997 the Board of Professional Affairs of the American Psychological Association bestowed an award on Exner for his "scientific contributions" and applauded his version of the Rorschach as "perhaps the single most powerful psychometric instrument ever envisioned."

 

These are bloated claims because research has shown that Exner's approach is beset by the same problems that have always plagued the test. The Rorschach--including Exner's version--tends to mislabel most normal people as "sick." In addition, the test cannot detect most psychological disorders nor does it do an adequate job of detecting most personality traits,

 

It is possible to conclude then, that the Hooker was administering a test of dubious standard for which she was inadequately trained or experienced. At best this is very unscientific!

 

Division 44

 

The APA, in Washington, DC, is the largest scientific and professional organization representing psychology in the United States and is the world’s largest association of psychologists. APA’s membership includes more than 150,000 researchers, educators, clinicians, consultants and students. Through its divisions in 53 subfields of psychology and affiliations with 60 state, territorial and Canadian provincial associations, APA works to advance psychology as a science, as a profession and as a means of promoting health, education and human welfare. The organisation is divided into separate specialised divisions each representing a particular aspect of psychology. Division 44 represents the 'Society for the Psychological Study of Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Issues' and was founded in 1985..

 

The aim of Division 44 is simply to advance the cause of homosexuality on the basis the condition is irreversible. It is viewed by many as a radical homosexual lobby. The APA itself has been dubbed by critics as the American Pedophile Association because it published a report in 1999 entitled, 'A Meta-Analytic Examination of Assumed Properties of Child Sexual Abuse Using College Samples'. The author, Bruce Rind, et.al, promoted adult-child sex, disputing the harmfulness of child molestation basing his findings on Kinsey's 1948 conclusions that child abuse could be harmless, even beneficial.

 

Since the American Psychiatric Association embraced the homosexual marriage idea in 2001, we should perhaps wonder why it took the APA so long to follow suit. Nevertheless, a seven-member panel of psychologists which included notable homosexuals and lesbians recommended same-sex marriage which was endorsed at the APA's annual convention in 2004. They affirmed the notion that prohibiting civil marriage for same-sex couples was discriminatory and unfairly denies such couples, their children and other members of their families the legal, financial and social advantages of civil marriage.

 

Designer Babies

 

The notoriety of one member of the panel is widely known. Dr. Candace A. McCullough, is a lesbian who attempted in 2002 to produce, for the second time, a deaf child by artificial insemination, using sperm from a deaf donor. Both McCullough and her lesbian partner, Sharon Duchesneau are deaf. 'It would be nice to have a deaf child who is the same as us.' said Duchesneau, who carried the baby to term. The Advocate (The National Gay & Lesbian News magazine) disclosed that the lesbian couple had earlier sought a deaf sperm donor to father their daughter, Jehanne, as well as later for their son Gauvin. It transpired that Jehanne is deaf and Gauvin is deaf in one ear and has severe hearing loss in the other. They do not consider their own deafness a 'disability', but an 'identity'. Both have been broadly condemned for their selfishness in intentionally giving a child a disability which will aggravate their disadvantages that come from being raised in a homosexual household. They are seen as creating disabled 'designer babies' to suit their lifestyle. What is clear, however, is that they have seriously discriminated against their own babies - the antithesis of their rational for gay marriage. Is this not a crucial civil and human injustice as well?

 

In the meantime, there is ongoing pressure from within the APA to remove paedophilia, exhibitionism, fetishism, transvestism, voyeurism and sadomasochism from the psychiatric manual of mental disorders. It is proposed that any sexual interest can be healthy and life-enhancing. Gay activists even claim that GID should not be assumed to be abnormal but rather an expression of healthy prehomosexuality. They claim that psychiatry has no basic theoretical model of what constitutes normal or healthy sexuality, so how is it possible to compare people whose sexual interests draws them to children or sadomasochism. They argue further that there is little or no proof that adult sex with children is harmful.

 

Dr. Robert Spitzer challenged the view that there was no scientific basis for distinguishing paraphilias from more common sexual behaviours. He observed, 'In all cultures, as children become adolescents, they develop an interest in sexual behavior. That is how we are designed - whether you believe this design is the work of God, or by evolution through natural selection. This design is clearly for the purpose of facilitating pair bonding and interpersonal sexual behavior.' He maintained that the paraphilias impair interpersonal sexual behaviour when severe. 'Sexual behavior that facilitates caring bonding between people is normal - and that which impairs it is abnormal, not merely an atypical variation. What is needed is more research on the treatment of the paraphilias, particularly pedophilia. To remove them from DSM-V would be the end of this much-needed research.'

 

Indeed, the fact that the APA are even having such a debate over such dysfunctional sexual behaviour indicates that science has been thrown out in favour of political correctness. Further on the downside, the homosexual proposals are entirely immoral and border on a profound madness.

 

Gay activists insist that homosexuality is biologically innate, psychologically irreversible, and sociologically normal. They are wrong on all counts. The gay worlds' leading propagandists, Kirk and Madsen remark, "To suggest in public that homosexuality might be chosen is to open the can of worms labeled 'moral choice and sin' and give the religious right Intransigents a stick to beat us with." And so to counter this homosexuals falsely claim their condition is biologically fixed.

 

Homosexual advocates have won a massive victory in the court of public opinion, and they won without even having to prove their case. Millions of people simply assume that science has 'discovered' a genetic basis for homosexual attraction and behaviour, and then assume that this would mean that homosexuality is just a predetermined trait. Of course, no genetic basis for homosexuality has ever been proved, and scientists are deeply divided over the very idea that homosexuality--or any human behaviour--can be traced to our genetic structure.

 

The idea of a so-called 'gay gene' was invented by homosexual activists as an argument that would help their cause. For the past fifteen years, those leading the movement to normalize homosexuality have staked their political strategy on claims that homosexuality is an inherited trait, like left-handedness, for a significant minority of human beings. Homosexuality, they have argued, is thus a 'natural' condition and one not morally significant. Indeed, if homosexuality is natural, they argue, discrimination against homosexuals would be wrong. But all of this is simple propaganda. The APA maintain homosexuality is not a mental disorder, a conclusion that is largely unscientific since they have not applied the principles of medical science to validate their avowed 'political' claim.

 

In fact, there's a good case for saying they really are heterosexuals with a homosexual problem. Should we find a gay gene, would we need to look further to identify a lesbian and transsexual one? Or are they all the same thing? Why stop there? What about a gene for alcoholics, insomniacs, wife-swappers, voyeurists, kleptomaniacs, or breathless one-legged politicians pushing wheelbarrows uphill on wet Wednesday afternoons in windy Westminster?

 

Stonewall

 

In June 1969, a riot happened in one of the best known unlicensed Mafia bars in New York called Stonewall. It was a haven for militant homosexuals, for drug trafficking, boy prostitution and pederasts. The police attempted to raid it but were beaten back in a riot that eventually ended the following morning when the bar was a burned-out wreck. Gay activists said the violence was a success which was subsequently celebrated in annual Gay Pride Parades. The popular gay slogan of the time went straight to the core of the issue - ‘Two, four, six, eight - Smash the family, smash the state.’ The homosexual sub-culture quickly developed across America involving ‘gay bars’, ‘street queens’, drug addicts and boy prostitutes as they demanded the right to public deviancy.

 

The Mattachine Society sought ‘organised resistance but eventually control of the gay community fell to a still more radical group - The Gay Liberation Front. Herbert Marcuse of the Frankfurt School was highly influential in leading this group. He was a long-time revolutionary communist and perhaps a homosexual who had learned this politics in pre-Nazi Germany. He had participated in the aborted 1919 German socialist Spartacist uprising . For him, procreative sexuality was repugnant and repressive.

 

This group next turned their attention to the American Psychiatric Association (APA) when they held conventions in San Francisco, Los Angeles and Chicago. Speakers were shouted down and the audience were terrorised and intimidated until eventually in 1973 the APA ‘voted’ that homosexuality was no longer a mental disorder.

 

One of the worst to employ Nazi violence was the AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power (ACT-UP), founded by Larry Kramer with 300 activists in 1987. Within months they gained national notoriety for aggressive acts against the Catholic Church in New York, Washington, Los Angles and Puerto Rico. Religious services were disrupted with screaming obscenities and damage. Later, one repentant leading activist, Eric Pollard, admitted their tactics were based on Hitler’s ‘Mein Kampf’. Shortly thereafter, ACT-UP spawned the more radical Queer Nation with its ‘in your face’ tactics that even antagonised the gay community. Labelled ‘Brownshirts’ or ‘lavender fascists' they adopted a highly militant rhetoric and openly threatened violence. A separate organisation, ‘Bigot Bashers’ specialised in threatening off petitioners. Interestingly, at the same time they hypocritically claimed they were victims of societal homophobia.

 

The inherent wrath of militant homosexuality continued until 1991 when a Bill before the National Assembly was defeated that would have extended minority status to gays. Thousand of homosexuals rioted in San Francisco clashing with police and setting fire to government buildings. Even a church pastor and his family endured a wave of terrorism in a campaign of hate. Church services were interrupted and a Swastika carved on the door. A sustained attempt to intimated one Christian in particular, led to screaming obscenities and personal threats against the children and finally the fire-bombing of the family home,

 

In recent years, however, especially during the Clinton administration, homosexuals have made huge political gains wielding enormous power in the media, academia and government.

 

The Wolfenden Committee

 

At home, Peter Wildeblood, diplomatic correspondent with the Daily Mail, was sentenced to 18 months’ imprisonment in 1954 for homosexual offences together with Lord Montagu of Beaulieu and Major Michael Pitt-Rivers. The case became a cause célèbre. Wildeblood's subsequent testimony to the Wolfenden Committee; set up by the Government to look into the laws on prostitution and homosexuality; eventually led to major changes in the sex laws.

 

In 1967 the law dramatically changed to allow sex between two consenting men over 21 providing it was in private. The number of men found guilty of gross indecency in 1966 was 420, but by 1971 it had more than trebled and by 1989 had risen to 2,500. Gays described this time as the period of anti-gay witch-hunt by the police. On the other side of the coin, however, gays recklessly stretched the parameters of legislation in order to secure greater acceptance. Gay Brian Paddick, former Metropolitan police chief, disclosed special instructions had to be obtained from higher authority to mount surveillance operations in public toilets because too many prominent people were being caught..

 

By the 1980’s, there were over 20,000 convictions for buggery, gross indecency, soliciting and procuring. Clearly, gays were increasingly defiant of the law, were busy organising themselves into a more cohesive pressure group and despite initial reluctance by the Trade Unions and Labour party eventually managed to garner additional support from them.

 

In 2002, the European Parliament debated the question of 'Fundamental Rights in the EU'. Some member states wanted to include homosexual rights on marriage and adoption. In a heated debate many conservative MEPs challenged the inclusion of sexual orientation discrimination. When put to the vote it was narrowly carried with a margin of only 26 votes.

 

The UK Government played an active role in negotiating two European Directives on equality. Their impact is significant in tackling discrimination across the EU. The Employment Directive outlaws discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation, religion or belief, disability and age in employment and vocational training. New legislation - The Employment Equality (Sexual Orientation) Regulations 2003 and the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003 - came into force in December 2003. Amendments to the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 will come into force in October 2004 and new legislation outlawing discrimination on grounds of age.

 

European Human Rights

 

On 1 January 2002, we signed up to the European Convention on Human Rights. As a result, a quiet revolution regarding many of our sex laws on homosexuality has taken place. Changes have been directly imposed on us by the European Court of Human Rights on behalf of gay litigants who felt unfairly treated. One of the first to complain were homosexuals Euan Sutherland and Chris Morris.

 

They felt that Britain's differing ages of consent for homosexual and heterosexual sex infringed their human rights to privacy and equal treatment. The Lords had previously resisted lowering the age of consent for sex between men from 18 to 16, so the Government threatened the Parliamentary Act to push through changes that would permit young people over 16 to indulge in homosexual acts.

 

One could be forgiven for thinking that the European 'sword of Damocles' forced the issue. But most of our legislatures took the view that 'equality' before the law was essential, others saw no difference between gays and heterosexuals. The Bill overwhelmingly passed 313 votes to 130.

 

Another case concerned a homosexual local government officer from Yorkshire identified only by the initials ADT. He was prosecuted for indulging in group sex with four others in 1996. The police seized a video of the five men engaging in oral sex from the home of one of them. ADT was convicted of gross indecency and given a two-year conditional discharge.

 

Dissatisfied, he took his case to the Strasbourg Court. They upheld his claim that the police had violated fundamental principles by '...an interference with the applicant's right to respect for a private family life' under article 8 of the ECHR. He was awarded nearly £21,000 in damages and £12,391 in costs. An elated Peter Thatcher described the ruling as an 'historic victory.'

 

The Sexual Offences Act 2003 soon followed. This ended the offences of soliciting by homosexuals, buggery, gross indecency, group sex and of assault with intent to commit buggery. Now, 'cruising' became endemic in many public parks, particularly in large conurbations.

 

Formerly, the police may have prosecuted the worst cases, but now they are more concerned with telling gays how not to be mugged or assaulted. On the other hand, 'cottaging' - gay sex in a public toilets - is still an offence though hardly policed at all.

Local gay lobby groups have successfully managed to influence individual forces throughout the country to treat cottaging within extreme circumspection invoking Article 8 and 14 of the ECHR which relates to 'respect for private life' and 'prohibition on discrimination' respectively.

 

With the aid of gay pressure groups and homosexual police, individual forces have drawn up lengthy and often detailed instructions on how homosexual infringements in public toilets are to be policed, if at all. Current indications are that gay law-breaking in public toilets will feature less and less in police statistics even though it is likely to grow. A considerable number of public toilets have since been closed down.

 

The Labour Government has since actively pushed gay rights within an eager European Union. Homosexual pressure is now ubiquitous, concentrated within the functions of state and increasingly taken up by trade unions and private monopolies. Workers are sacked for having legitimate reserved opinion against homosexuality and Christian organisations banned from banks. Religious opinion and history in democratic society is being squashed to silence by what is seen as a super hoax.

 

Indeed, it was finally disclosed in 2008, that three months prior to Tony Blair becoming the Prime Minister, that he had a private meeting with the homosexual actor Sir Ian McKellen. In an effort to defeat Section 28 which prohibited local authorities from advancing homosexual interests, McKellen had set up Stonewall, a gay pressure body. He observed, “I reeled off Stonewall’s demands and he nodded, wrote them down and put a tick by them all. Then he said we will do all that.” Since then, of course, Section 28 has been replaced with compulsory gay propaganda in schools, gay adoption, gay marriage, lowering the age of consent and other laws protecting or advancing the homosexual agenda. Blair has yet to understand how foolish he has been in colluding with an inherently destructive set of behaviours.

 

Subsequent to this first disclosure, it now transpires that McKellen is already attending schools to teach the virtues of gay sex and he wants other gays to revisit their former schools to do the same.
 

Shortly the educational system will seriously falter under the weight of a homosexual culture and our children will fall prey to gay propaganda. Kids will be taught that homosexuality is normal and healthy with the inevitable result more children will be enticed into it only to suffer its miserable gripping consequences characterised by mental turmoil, depression and suicidal ideation.

 

Finally is the fact that Prime Minister Gordon Brown further actively endorses homosexuality. His wife, Sarah Brown hosted a private lunch at Downing Street in October 2008 to honour veteran American homosexual campaigner David Mixner, 62. He has spent much of his life lobbying against family values in pushing gay rights. He praised the recent advances in gay rights in the UK and warned against taking them for granted.

 

Most of the 20 guests were prominent homosexuals including the Chief Whip Nick Brown, Health Minister Ben Bradshaw, Treasury Minister Angela Eagle, Deputy Leader of the Commons Nick Bryant and MEP Michael Cashman.

 

Ben Summerskill, Stonewall Chief Executive also attended. He later remarked, “It is fantastic that Sarah Brown has recognised gay people. It is another small historical step forward.”
 

 

 

 

Copyright      |     Contact us     |     Top      |     Next    


 

 

 

 

.