Complexities and Consequences
Gay Propaganda
Homosexual men and women try to soften their image by using the 'gay' word that conveys a happy, carefree or lively interpretation. Seriously, this is a miserable misnomer because the truly negative aspect is loneliness, substance abuse, depression, suicide or an incurable fatal disease for a disproportionate number! The gay phrase is also distanced from the clinical mental disorder label. Radical homosexual propagandists are careful what phrases and words they use. They deliberately use sanitized and intentionally misleading euphemisms to conceal the true dark unhealthy nature of homosexual behaviour.
The homosexual lobby have used another interesting ploy to advance their cause. They claim that homophobia in the wider community is the source of their depression and suicide. But this is a false construct to win public sympathy and acceptance. We must allow for the fact that homosexual men and women find sex an exceptionally compulsive activity and pursue different partners to heighten gratification. Thus erotic satisfaction and pleasure is enhanced through promiscuity.
But on the downside is an intense inner sense of self-
Homosexuals as Definers of Power
On the eve of the UK’s first gay weddings, Denis
Campbell of the Observer was again pointing to, ‘Record numbers of gay men and lesbians,
whose sexuality is neither a secret nor a source of controversy, occupy key positions
across British life. They influence the entertainment we consume, how safe our streets
are, the quality of our hospitals, how well solicitors perform, the country's political
direction and much else besides. They are doers, decision-
What Campbell suggests is that their homosexuality is irrelevant.
To do this one must take a very narrow perspective on what is involved. The gay lifestyle
is addictive, constrictive, mentally and physically debilitating, as well as a threat
to traditional family life and conventional mores and principles. One must wonder
if Campbell has an agenda?
Limited research by Barclay’s Bank on gay customers found
that 40 percent of the women and 25 percent of the men were professionals; 11 percent
of the women and 13 percent of the men were managers; five percent of the women and
six percent of the men were senior managers; and eight percent of both sexes were
clerical and office workers. Now many commercial businesses are chasing the pink
pound with estimates of up to £60bn in the gay economy. Further evidence, one might
suggest, that the homosexual world is far from being blighted and damned.
The Gay Marriage Controversy
When the idea of gay marriage in the form of a civil
partnership was first considered it was estimated it would cost about £40 million
to run each year. Homosexuals made out it was a major concern to them and that literally
thousands of gays were desperately seeking to tie the knot. They sought several advantages
over and above what was available to heterosexual couples.
In March 2004, the Government
announced the introduction of a Civil Partnerships Bill. The Bill essentially includes
the same conditions as a conventional marriage but ministers were keen to distance
themselves from the gay marriage label. It is widely accepted that a Civil Partnership
is marriage in all but name. This is hardly surprising! During the Second Reading
of the Lords debate, Baroness O'Cathain revealed the Government actually intended
to introduce the literal conditions of a conventional marriage whilst simultaneously
deceptively denying any such possibility. It was done to avoid any public backlash.
In
2001, the Office for National Statistics found that there were fewer than 40,000
stable gay couples in Britain. But the figures were ignored. Compare this with the
4.6 million people who live together in non-
Reflecting the Left's preoccupation for pushing the homosexual agenda
on British society, the case for gay marriage is another good example of exaggerating
the figures in order to establish a cause. In November 2002, Trade and Industry Secretary,
Patricia Hewitt, a veteran extreme feminist, appointed Angela Mason, diversity campaigner
and former director of Stonewall', as the new director of the Government's Women
and Equality Unit. This is the equivalent of giving a chocoholic a job with Cadbury's.
Interestingly,
Angela Mason's department had initially calculated there would be up to 425,600 civil
partnerships by 2050. Less then a year later the figures were drastically revised
down showing a take-
Compared with
the historically low rate of heterosexual marriages of 260,000 each year, homosexual
marriage hardly warranted the attention it was being given especially when they could
simply make reciprocal arrangements to safeguard each other’s interest. Where this
is not possible, the government could have made suitable legal amendments to provide
relief in the relevant circumstances. The Bill created an incentive for homosexuals
and non-
But why does the gay community appeal for gay marriage if only a few
will take advantage of it? A leading homosexual activist reveals the answer. Michelangelo
Signorile used Out! magazine in 1994, to state that homosexuals should '...fight
for same-
The Bill before Parliament was hardly modest.
It is a fundamental rewriting of the entire basis of family law, pension and taxation
law and will prove discriminatory. What was intended amounts to social vandalism
since marriage is our prime social and legal institution. It will add to the instability
of family life that is already seriously threatened with a growing number of fatherless
children. As Lord Higgins has observed, '...this Bill opens a Pandora's Box.'
Critics
of the Government point out that millions of heterosexual couples will be ignored
because there is no provision for them. This will probably lead to a Human Rights
issue should the Bill proceed as intended. The Government will eliminate one minority
discrimination only create another for a majority.
They think that gay marriage is
good for the stability of traditional marriage, which beggar’s belief as all the
evidence is against this foolhardy contention. Yet logically and correctly think
that making provisions for opposite sex couples will undermine the popularity of
marriage. Other studies, however, show an abnormally high divorce rate among gays
and lesbians.
The privileged legal status of marriage is unique because it bestows
the offspring for future generations. It essentially guarantees a continuity and
good marriages add immeasurably to an ordered civil society. By adopting the gay
marriage model we begin to undermine the value of traditional marriage. Heterosexual
couples are already demanding special provisions of a civil partnership to avoid
the responsibilities of conventional marriage. So it is likely that the historical
position of marriage will be undermined,
Already, religious gay activists object that
the Civil Partnership Bill is confined to a secular process. They want the full-
The Government was also keen to impose new legislation on the people
of Northern Ireland whilst Stormont was suspended. In a recent census in the Province,
only 288 same-
Gays and lesbian activists pretend they only wish tolerance when
in fact they want to seduce 'straights' and change the heterosexual character of
society in general. The demand for gay marriage should be viewed in this context.
It should be closely observed that the notion of a civil partnership, or same-
At the time they were
considering the impact of gay marriage, the government estimated that by 2010 between
11,000 and 22,000 persons would be in a civil partnership in that single year. As
it turned out, this was a sloppy estimate because after the first year of implementation
it was established in 2007 that 16,106 gay weddings had taken place involving 32,212
homosexual men and women. Gay men were involved in 9,648 and lesbians in 6554 same-
Two points can be made here. First, this is
indeed small fry if compared to the hotly disputed claim of a 3.6 million homosexual
population. Second, the formal union involved mostly people in the middle and late
forties. This reflects other evidence elsewhere that younger homosexuals largely
shun gay marriage.
So far, however, the conversion to homosexual culture
has proved a remarkable gambit and there is evidence it has been made with great
deliberation!
Over the last 50 years or so their number and interests have literally
mushroomed. Before that, homosexuality was rare, mostly concealed and marginalised.
They even used a secret gay language in the 1960's called 'polari' to conceal their
inclination. Paul Baker, a leading expert says polari is making a comeback with a
hit London play and a camp cabaret. This is seen as a milestone in the mainstreaming
of gay culture.
Moreover, the gay lobby want to obliterate the term 'homosexual',
suggesting it is demeaning and implies deviance or disorder. Yet, despite this calculated,
on-
It is interesting to note that the homosexual term was an invention of Hungarian-
Now universally numbered in millions, they have multi-
.
They
now conspire in myriad ways on an international scale. Homosexual pressure groups
demonstrate a proselytising zeal. The Sodomy Lobby seldom slumbers. They never take
'No' as an answer and undiminished, repeatedly push their demands. Progressively
on the offensive, they are defiantly indulgent about their behaviour, but as you
will discover, some elements of this is bizarre and extreme,
The Pan-
The social endorsement and affirmation of a homosexual orientation
opens the pan-
Some go on to practice more than anal-
Homosexuals deflect personal responsibility for the harm
they cause and want the rest of society to ignore it. Many deny or avoid their shame
and loneliness through promiscuity, alcohol and drugs.
The Gender Recognition Act 2004
It’s worth mentioning that the gender-
Gender dysphoria is a condition in which a person is intensely confused or feels discomfort about their birth gender. It is without any biological basis and they may be heterosexual, homosexual or bisexual. Science is still guessing as it its cause. The NHS estimate about 1 in 30,000 adult genetic males and 1 in 100,000 genetic females seek to change their sex. But the Gender Recognition Act denies the biological basis of sexual identity. A small panel of ‘experts’ may defy nature and reverse the sexual identity of any person who thinks they belong to the other sex. Thus, biology is replaced with a disordered fantasy!
So, for example, a person born a man, married as a man and a father to children could obtain a birth certificate confirming he is a woman. If single, the Act gives a person all the rights to marry and any benefits that follow. It will be a criminal offence to make any reference to the persons true sexual identity. For the first time in British legal history, people will formally be compelled to lie. And this for a minority interest of about 5,000 people who suffer from gender dysphoria, of whom about 400 go on to receive transgender treatment each year so as to 'assume' the body of the opposite sex. Some then regret their reassignment and yearn to revert to their former condition.
The Act is silent about the question of child support. So, should a father become a transsexual and opt for official recognition to become a woman, he is free from any legal obligation to the child support agency if he divorces. And what about an employer who hired Jack who now wants a job with a different firm as Jane? It will be a crime to reveal this.
The implications for same-
One of the more widely known transsexuals is Nadia Almada, 27, winner of Channel 4’s 2004, Big Brother. Portuguese by birth, he underwent surgery reportedly costing some £15,000. Flushed with victory he exclaimed, ‘I’m overjoyed I’ve been accepted as a woman for the first time. It’s the most amazing feeling – I could burst with happiness.’ Later he said he was a virgin who couldn’t wait to have sex as a woman. But what does this victory tell us about changing attitudes to sexual mores in the UK? Moreover, matters were not quite so romantic. Nadia had hoodwinked the British public because within months he sensationally confessed to being a transsexual prostitute. Earning £1,000 each week selling his body to men he exclaimed, '...the money was so good and the attention so great that I became addicted. I couldn't stop myself.'
Thanks to David Batty of the Guardian there is additional information. Problems associated with Gender Identity Disorder have there own peculiar twist. Take the case of Marissa Dainton, 36, who changed sex three times in 11 years. She started life as Mark Dainton in 1967. After assuming an identity as Patricia Vincent, she had her first sex operation in 1993. Four years on, she reverted to Mark and got married, but now she is a woman again. She once had a penis, then a vagina, and now nothing. ‘What happened to me should be a lesson in the need to make sure you're really ready before changing gender,’ she philosophical observes.
Remarkably, Dainton has reached a degree of understanding with his wife. ‘I was all
prepared for us to separate but we didn't want to, so we agreed to find another solution,’
she observes. They intend to stay together to try to work out an amicable separation.
‘It's a very hard situation. As she sees it, she's lost her husband. I find myself
in this bizarre situation of trying to comfort her in her grief and I'm the person
she's grieving for.’
Changing sex has always been controversial. The first recorded cases in the early 20th century show doctors were baffled when apparently healthy people requested gender reassignment. Some doctors considered them a type of homosexual, transvestite or hermaphrodite; others labelled them mentally ill, deviants or perverts. Some patients were treated with electric shock therapy, supposedly to relieve their depression. Many doctors preferred to let someone commit suicide rather than offer them treatment.
By the 1960s, patients were travelling across the world for surgery, usually to Casablanca. But during that decade the term transsexual gained greater acceptance among the medical profession, and gender identity clinics, providing hormones and surgery, opened in the US and UK. The first British clinic opened at Charing Cross hospital in west London. Back then, it received about 50 referrals a year.
During the 1980’s, this had risen to 100-
Despite such success stories, primary care trusts remain reluctant to fund gender
reassignment. Some health officials dispute its long-
The Royal College of Psychiatrists (RCP) has set up a gender identity disorder working party to draw up new UK guidelines to address the concerns of medics and transsexuals. Its chair, Kevan Wylie, a consultant psychiatrist in Sheffield, wants to see patients assessed and supported by a range of counsellors, therapists, psychiatrists or psychologists, rather than just one psychiatrist as is often the case. He believes a team of experts is more likely to spot a patient's misgivings.
Dr. Wylie admits: "There is currently no consensus on treatment." He says that draft UK standards of care are expected to be ready next January. But this deadline looks increasingly unlikely because of certain professional difficulties.
The lack of medical consensus has led some to call for a moratorium on gender reassignment. Alan Finch helped to set up the Gender Identity Awareness Association, to dissuade people from genital surgery and campaign against what he calls the "sex change industry". In April, the chief psychiatrist of Victoria State began an inquiry into the Monash gender clinic, Melbourne, where Finch was treated. But Finch wants all treatment stopped, arguing that transsexualism was invented by psychiatrists.
"Their language is illusory. You fundamentally can't change sex," he says. "The surgery doesn't alter you genetically. It's genital mutilation. My 'vagina' was just the bag of my scrotum. It's like a pouch, like a kangaroo. What's scary is you still feel like you have a penis when you're sexually aroused. It's like phantom limb syndrome. It's all been a terrible misadventure. I've never been a woman, just Alan."
Finch, formerly known as Helen, wants to know why people who want a sex change are treated differently from other psychiatric patients who hate their bodies. He says: "The fact that someone's suicidal and wanting something isn't a reason to provide it. The analogy I use about giving surgery to someone desperate to change sex is it's a bit like offering liposuction to an anorexic
Birmingham University's Aggressive Research Intelligence Facility recently assessed
the findings of more than 100 follow-
It found that most research was poorly designed, which skewed the results in favour
of physically changing sex. There was no evaluation of whether other treatments,
such as long-
Their findings of the few studies that have tracked significant numbers of patients over several years were flawed because the researchers lost track of at least half of the participants. The potential complications of hormones and genital surgery, which include deep vein thrombosis and incontinence respectively, have not been thoroughly investigated, either.
‘There is huge uncertainty over whether changing someone's sex is a good or a bad
thing,’ says Dr Chris Hyde, director of the Birmingham facility. ‘While no doubt
great care is taken to ensure that appropriate patients undergo gender reassignment,
there's still a large number of people who have the surgery but remain traumatised
-
Dr Andrew McCulloch, chief executive of the Mental Health Foundation, has asked the
mental health minister, Rosie Winterton, to set up an inquiry into gender reassignment.
He says: ‘I find it extraordinary that there's no long-
This is not an easy task. Many transsexuals suffer from serious mental health problems
as a result of the prejudice they face and the torment of living in what they regard
as the wrong body. It can be particularly difficult to judge whether patients with
borderline personality disorder, characterised by impulsive behaviour, a poor sense
of identity and self-
What is quite remarkable about the current situation is that while medical science is uncertain and uneasy about the very condition of transsexuality, actual changes in the law do not reflect the same sense of indecision. This may be due to the fact that the legislatures were more concerned with the legal issues than with medical ones. Given this degree of uncertainty, Parliament may have acted prematurely and the legislative changes may even prove damaging.
Surprisingly, the American Psychological Association hardly mentions transsexuality at all. If you type the phrase into the search engine of their website only five minor references are noted. But notably, there is a paper that associates childhood GID with homosexuality.
Gays and Mental Disorders
Accordingly, it's no surprise that significant research
in 2005 by the Royal College of Psychiatrists, found that gay, lesbian and bisexual
men and women suffer high levels of mental disorder. Homosexuals then blame heterosexual
homophobia for their difficulty. Research, internationally, repetitively finds that
homosexuality is associated with increased rates of depression, anxiety, illicit
drug dependence and suicidal ideation.
Current research by Professor King and Annie
Bartlett reported in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health , February
2006, indicate lesbians have higher risk of breast cancer and higher alcohol and
cardiovascular disease (overweigh with cigarette smoking) than heterosexual women.
Gay men are at higher risk of contracting sexual infections and HIV than straight
men, Both gay men and lesbians have higher rates of anxiety, depressions, substance
use disorders and suicidal behaviour. Uncertain, they can only speculate about the
aetiology of psychosocial problems. The latest American research indicates that people
with HIV have even higher levels of depression/anxiety and drug/alcohol abuse.
However, no such reservation inhibits the more recent distressing findings under
the guise of ‘research’ carried out over three years in Northern Ireland by the Rainbow
Project, an avowedly homosexual lobby group. Entitled ‘Out on your own’ it is aimed
specially at Government calling for supportive initiatives, particularly in schools
to combat homophobia. It is another flawed study by gays. The 100-
Campaigners for the Rainbow Project say the research illustrates that homophobic
attitudes and prevailing heterosexism, together with the isolation that homosexuality
might bring, play a major part in the incidence of emotional and mental health difficulties,
suicidal ideation and self-
What is clear is that the respondents in the study identified strongly with mental,
emotional and psychological difficulties which is associated with their perceived
negative treatment by heterosexual society. The findings, however, are wholly undermined
because nowhere is there any evidence of causality -
The report is eager to blame the homophobia of heterosexual society while discarding any possibility that homosexuality has its own inherent problems. More useful, the report identifies relevant universal research which demonstrates that homosexuality results in psychological, psychosocial, psychiatric and social health problems constituting a potential major health problem.
Meanwhile, critics remain unconvinced the so-
Homosexual Happy Hour
With no objection, British television nightly pours out homosexual
information under the guise of entertainment or as serious pseudo-
Homosexuality enjoys a happy hour of homage, hospitality
and honour. It's 'hurrah Henry' for his horny hosts!
Taste is tattered; shit is shiny
sheen and the new bigamy -
We
function scatologically without distinction to wholehearted humane feeling. The measured
pattern of life's true pleasing passion is locked in the raw animalistic vice of
Pavlovian dog-
Gay Rape and Victimisation
In contrast, there is a growing volume of research showing
notable intolerance among cohabiting gays and lesbians which may be the reason for
the low take-
Research by Sigma in 1994 revealed that one
third of active homosexual men in their study had been forced into anal intercourse.
Further, a 1999 study of 2,474 men by Professor Michael King of the London Royal
Free and University College Medical School was reported in The British Medical Journal.
This disclosed it was not uncommon for men to rape men. Homosexual practices sometimes
involve sado-
But gays do not want you to
know about these unsavoury facts because 'Pride' is the buzzword and credibility
the cause!
But a growing volume of research shows that homosexuality increases the
likelihood of mental disorders and that elevated psychiatric morbidity is not fully
explained in terms of stigma, prejudice, and victimization. Even so, does this potential
for mental morbidity account for the fact homosexuals have shorter lives, despite
continued medical advances?
Now comes the research findings of the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
which identifies cognitive impairment in people with AIDS. Cognitive impairment is
caused when the HIV virus attacks the brain and can be a complicated syndrome resulting
in deficits in mood, behaviour, motor coordination and thought processes. More people
with AIDS-
Homosexual
Heterophobia
In the final analysis, the problem is not heterosexual homophobia, but surprisingly,
homosexual heterophobia. Flesh it out a little! Heterophobia is a prejudice or discrimination
based on pro-
Fact -
More generally, any opposition to homosexuality is labelled as homophobia. This generic
phrase is a cunning counter-
In short, gays want society to deal with them with compassion. Those who do not,
or are critical of their lifestyle, are stigmatised, vilified and denigrated with
abuse. Opponents are thus harassed and harangued in order to silence them, sometimes
accompanied with a menacing under-
It is the classical psychological defence mechanism of projection. Gays unconsciously
attribute to others their own feelings, thoughts and intentions. The homosexual personality
is displaced upon heterosexual people. This can lead to a distortion of reality,
paranoia, or even feelings of aggression. Someone else has to be blamed for their
problems. Homosexuals who feel inferior project inferiority onto heterosexual others.
Moreover, it is clear that so-
We will shortly examine what influence they wield nationally and internationally
and how this is translated into major changes in law and custom. Some claim the homosexual
rights movement is not a cause based on science, social justice, or fairness toward
a 'persecuted minority.' Rather, it is the work of a devious and clandestine fifth
column that seeks to undermine the moral values of the Western World. There is substantial
and compelling evidence for this even from the gay community.
They have the power
to manipulate damaging disclosure about their life-
But internationally known lesbian activist Camille Paglia
has observed, 'Our sexual bodies were designed for reproduction... No one is born
gay. ... homosexuality is an adaptation, not an inborn trait.' There is a lot of
experiential evidence to back her assertion, but gays reject this to deny any evidence
of 'choice'. The claim that queers are born that way is scientifically baseless.
No Gay Gene
Homosexuality emerges as a complex socially conditioned behaviour, which
can and does change. Thousand of homosexuals recuperate each year. Thus, the American
Psychiatric Association; a formidable professional body that strongly supports gay
rights; observes in their Fact Sheet on Sexual Orientation (2000), 'There are no
replicated scientific studies supporting any specific biological etiology for homosexuality.'
An additional statement by the APA was made in May 2009 reiterating the ‘No gay gene’ idea. This stated, "There is no consensus among scientists about the exact reasons that an individual develops a heterosexual, bisexual, gay or lesbian orientation. Although much research has examined the possible genetic, hormonal, developmental, social, and cultural influences on sexual orientation, no findings have emerged that permit scientists to conclude that sexual orientation is determined by any particular factor or factors.
Moreover, in 2005 a research team at the University of Illinois screened the entire
human genome system. Led by Dr. Brian Mustanski, he concluded, 'Sexual orientation
is a complex trait. There is no one "gay" gene.' Homosexual propaganda consistently
ignores such scientific evidence.
More telling, an Australian study of identical twins
in 2000 found only 20% male homosexual and 24% female homosexual had a gay twin.
Yet if genes determine sexual orientation, the figure should be 100% because importantly,
identical twins have identical genes.
So, if the condition is not biologically determined,
it has to be embraced as a life-
Society would view homosexuality differently if it thought that the pain
and suffering associated with it was preventable. Indeed, putting aside any religious
principle, simply human morality and compassion must question the legitimacy of encouraging
and facilitating self-
Reparative Therapy
Research published in the well-
Spencer is the prestigious Professor of Psychiatry and Chief of Biometrics Research
at the New York State Psychiatric Institute. In 2001 he published ‘Can Some Gay men
and Lesbians Change Their Sexual Orientation? 200 Participants Reporting a Change
From Homosexual to Heterosexual Orientation. It was conclusive in stating change
was possible and substantive. He found no evidence of adverse harm and condemned
mental health professionals who deny that change is possible. He challenged them
to be more open claiming, ‘Many patients can make a rational choice to work toward
developing their heterosexual potential and minimising their unwanted homosexual
attractions.’
Homosexuals responded by threatening to destroy his career or by claiming his research
was amateurish and shoddy. Other researchers, however, support Spitzer and are treated
in a similar fashion. These include Dean Byrd of the University of Utah, Jeffrey
Satinover, Yarhouse and Jones and Doctor Joseph Niclosi of Narth. Evidence of harm
is mostly generated by the gay lobby and is methodologically suspect because it is
far from being impartial.
Similar programmes are successfully carried out each year
in the UK involving thousands of homosexual men and women. Even so, only 0.3% of
men in Great Britain is exclusively homosexual throughout their lives according to
the largest study of its kind ever carried out in the UK.
Indeed, two American experts, Stanton Jones and Mark Yarhouse, observe in their Homosexuality:
The Use of Scientific Research in the Church’s Moral Debate, (2000), that lifelong
exclusive or near-
Additionally, the Edward Laumann et. al., study (1994) The Social Organization of
Sexuality: Sexual Practices in the United States was the first to unexpectedly discover
that homosexuality is not a stable trait. The authors state that “Estimating a single
number for the prevalence of homosexuality is a futile exercise.” It is futile not
because of bias, underreporting, methodological difficulties, or complexities of
behaviour, but “...because it presupposes assumptions that are patently false: that
homosexuality is a uniform attribute across individuals, that it is stable over time
and that if can be easily measured.” All the evidence points to the fact that homosexuality
is not fixed. Moreover, they also found to their surprise that homosexual instability
over the course of life was one-
So striking was this finding that it led researchers all over the world in subsequent
years to see it it was really true. Numerous large-
Loosing the Battle Against HIV/AIDS
Though it would be vehemently denied, homosexual practices have led directly or indirectly
to the death of some 20 million people worldwide. The future looks gruesome! Experts
predict that by 2010, one-
According to
UNAIDS, in poor countries drugs are being allocated to political and military elites.
With the epidemic still in its infancy and at least 39 million HIV-
In Sub-
WHO announced in 2003 it wanted to put
three million people on anit-
The Chinese government says there are 840,000
people in China infected with HIV, but health experts say the figure could rise to
ten million by 2010.
In a world-
A Politicised Disease
HIV/AIDS is the most politicised disease ever. Back in the early
1980's, when the epidemic broke out in San Francisco, Los Angeles and New York),
gay leaders' successfully subverted the public health system to conceal the nature
of the epidemic.
They specifically refused to close the breeding ground for AIDS
-
Explaining why misguided policies go unchallenged, Gabriel Rotello, a founder
of ACT-
Now, psychiatry
and psychotherapy throughout the Western World have colluded with homosexual activist
to declare homosexuality as 'normal'. However, there are still many who disagree.
Super Infections
In recent years a new more virulent strain of HIV has been detected in New York.
This new aggressive virus causes AIDS within months instead of nine to ten years.
The nightmare super-
A similar outbreak of hard-
Even if the warning turns out to be a false alarm, many AIDS experts say it is only a matter of time before a supervirus does emerge. 'You can't have a core group of people having sex with large numbers of people without amplifying any sexually transmitted disease that enters the system,' said Gabriel Rotello, author of Sexual Ecology: AIDS and the Destiny of Gay Men. 'I don't have any doubt that a resurgent HIV epidemic will hit the gay population in the near future,' he said. Even Peter Tatchell is scared. Speaking to the Independent he fears the practice of ‘barebacking’; men who have repeated unprotected often anonymous sex with men; could lead to a superstrain of HIV. We will examine this practice in greater detail later.
Is it possible to be infected more than once? Until about 1994, it was generally
thought that individuals do not become infected with multiple distinct HIV-
All cases of coinfection were once assumed to be the result of people being exposed to the different strains more or less simultaneously, before their immune systems had had a chance to react. However, it is now thought that "superinfection" is also occurring. In these cases, the second infection occurred several months after the first. It would appear that the body's immune response to the first virus is sometimes not enough to prevent infection with a second strain, especially with a virus belonging to a different subtype. It is not yet known how commonly superinfection occurs, or whether it can take place only in special circumstances.
In Britain, people with the HIV virus have one of the highest levels of drug resistance
in the world, and the rate is increasing. The trend suggests a wave of infections
from a drug resistant strain of virus may be on the way, according to a study just
published in the British Medical Journal. The report by the UK Group on Transmitted
HIV Drug Resistance warned that the reduction in effective drugs to treat patients
represented 'a major clinical and public health problem'.
Andrew Sullivan the gay
HIV+ acclaimed Sunday Times columnist, distressingly notes that death in his community
is less an event than an environment. He remarks, 'Gay life and gay death are not
separate issues, meeting occasionally at the bedside or the grave. They are wedded
to each other.' Does this disturb you? If you claim genuine empathy for homosexual
men and women, it should!
Some Complexities on Homosexuality
Politicians are giving homosexuals, bisexuals and lesbians increased credibility
and this is seen to add to their respectability. But their appetite for additional
change remains insatiated. One of the justifications for changing the law in 1967
enabling two consenting adults to indulge in homosexual acts in private was to eliminate
potential blackmail. But how far has it gone? On the international scene they now
want the rights to gay marriage and adoption, even 'group marriage' (two lesbians
and a male sperm donor}, fertility treatment and trans-
Take the bizarre situation of a British male-
But now along comes another distressing malady called Body Integrity Identity Disorder
(BIID). Much like Gender Identity Disorder (GID) or transsexualism, it's focused
on mutilating the body. In the case of BIID, however, it literally means the amputation
of whole body limbs. They are a growing visible group of people who call themselves
'amputee wannabes'. It is a psychological condition that relates to urges first experienced
during pre-
First identified in 1977 as Apotemnophilia, or 'Amputee Identity Disorder' (AID),
it pertains to self-
Feelings of BIID can start as early as 4 or 5 years of age. Despite the fact medical science is attempting to describe the phenomenon, they have great difficulty in explaining it and research is minimal. There is currently no consensus on what causes the desire for amputation and is mostly confined to males. These little known syndromes offer a new challenge to diagnosis and sex therapy Two cases involving elective surgery in 1997 and 1999 subsequently led to critical publicity in the media. Since, then the NHS has banned the procedure. However, some sufferers have seriously damaged a limb in order to obtain a clinical amputation. Methods include freezing with dry ice, using fire, lying on railway tracks and even blasting a limb with a shotgun. Although small in number; many fear 'coming out'; experts anticipate they are growing.
And what about the current practice of 'gelding' (orchiectomy) -
More extreme behaviour is found with those who practice bizarre body modification and manipulation. In some cases, groups of individuals hook up their genitals or vagina with metal hooks joined to each other with chains. Equally harrowing conduct is with those who employ body suspension. Here, the body is literally suspended by chains connected to metal hooks into the skin. The practice requires 7.5cm steel deep sea fishing hooks freshly inserted under the skin for each suspension. A basic "suicide" hang uses hooks in the back, a chest suspension requires hooks in front, a knee suspension puts the body upside down, and the "Superman" pose requires hooks along the back and upper thighs. The hooks are attached to ropes, and pulleys slowly lift the body off the floor.
They are another highly secretive group whose numbers are growing.
Homosexual Parenting
Both British and American research shows the downside of homosexual parenting. Children
from such homes were more likely to report having had sex with a parent, experience
homosexuality as their first sexual encounter, be sexually molested, become homosexual
or bisexual and report dissatisfaction with their childhood. Other studies indicate
children of homosexuals doubt their own sexuality, are embarrassed by their homosexual
parents and are teased and taunted by their peers.
American researchers Robert Lerner
and Althea Nagai, experts in the field of quantitative analysis, evaluated 49 studies
on homosexual parenting -
Lerner
and Nagai, published their 2001 analysis in a paper entitled 'No Basis: What the
Studies Don't Tell Us about Same-
Professor
Lyn Wardle, who criticised the same-
British sociologist, Patricia
Morgan, weighed in with her own analysis, 'Children as Trophies -
The few studies which track children to adulthood are also flawed, according
to Morgan. She criticises Fiona Tasker and Susan Golombok's work published in 'Growing
Up in a Lesbian Family' for comparing children of lesbian women who have Ph.Ds with
those of poorly educated lone parents and for downplaying negative effects such as
teasing by peers.
Morgan says is it is astonishing that 'gushing personal testimonies'
by lesbian parents should be 'reverentially accepted by public bodies, academics
and research institutes who would immediately laugh away the use of similar materials
as evidence elsewhere'....
Interestingly, 1996 research by Doctor Sotirious Sarantakos's
Associate Professor of Sociology in Australia, entitled Children in Three Contexts
compared 58 children of same-
Reference
has already been made to Paediatrician Dr Joy Holloway’s 2000 research paper, ‘Homosexual
parenting:does it make a difference?’ This questioned the dubious methodology of
current surveys used to support gay adoption and usefully demonstrated the harmful
effects flowing from lesbian adoptions in which the children clearly suffered.
There
is no substantive research that demonstrates children largely benefit, socially,
physically or psychologically, when brought up in a homosexual 'family', but there
is a preponderance of science that shows children are damaged. Professor AH Halsey
has observed that children brought up outside of a traditional marriage suffer many
major disadvantages. They die earlier, have more illnesses, do less well at school,
experience more unemployment and are more prone to deviance and crime and are more
likely to repeat the cycle of unstable parenting from which they have suffered.
Given
the current body of research, the American College of Pediatricians believes it is
inappropriate, potentially hazardous to children and dangerously irresponsible to
change the age-
The ACP claim that violence among homosexual partners is two to three times
more common than among married heterosexual couples. Homosexual partnerships are
significantly more prone to dissolution than heterosexual marriages with the average
homosexual relationship lasting only two to three years. Homosexual men and women
are reported to be inordinately promiscuous involving serial sex partners, even with
what are loosely-
Children reared in homosexual households are more likely to experience
sexual confusion, practice homosexual behaviour, and engage in sexual experimentation.
Adolescents and young adults who adopt the homosexual lifestyle, like their adult
counterparts, are at increased risk of mental health problems, including major depression,
anxiety disorder, conduct disorder, substance dependence and especially suicidal
ideation and suicide attempts.
Meanwhile, pederasts, gender-
Homosexual Love
Current Scandinavian research shows that lesbian couples stay together for only a
while longer than do male homosexual couples whose relationship last about two years.
More disturbingly, evidence from countries that have practiced same-
Data now available from Sweden (May 2004) that represents the first systematic review
of same-
That aside, gay men and women see surrogacy and artificial insemination as part of
the normalisation of homosexuality itself. They even use the tem 'gayby' to refer
to their babies. But from another point of view, it is the equivalent of trafficking
in human beings. Presently there are increasing demands to purchase babies. Homosexual
men ''rent a womb' with no more thought than they give buying a car. Probably the
worst example of this is the two American homosexuals who between them have fathered
five children from the same mother. Thus the children have two fathers and a mother.
And what about the 51 year-
The interest of the child is lost to bolster what for some is an inherently tenuous lesbian relationship. There is a serious contradiction here! Homosexuals vociferously demand their rights but have a total disregard for the potential rights of their children. Thus, the homosexual cause is profoundly and profanely egotistical. The claim for fun is greater than the demand for family. Another good reason, so it seems, to reject the values, norms and responsibilities of a heterosexual society. Homosexuals might wish to challenge this by pointing out they also want families, but outside of the conventional constraints of traditional marriage. But this would be hypocritical for two important reasons. First, the majority of homosexual men and women have no interest in children within a traditional setting whatsoever, and second, those few that do indulge themselves in unorthodox and revolutionary relationships which run counter to the heterosexual culture.
The homosexual asprational claim for diversity must ultimately been seen for what it is. At best a challenge, at worst a threat to the foundation of social conventionality.
To this end in 2002 an unregulated commercially driven IVF Internet service called
‘Man Not Included’, started in the UK. It followed a similar one in America. Run
by former City head-
Two years from inception, however, they are in deep trouble. A timely expose by ‘The Mail on Sunday’ shows they have routinely flaunted crucial guarantees. The quality of the supplied sperm and the background of male donors is seriously questioned.
A former employee claimed that sperm donors had few of the psychological, social
or intellectual characteristics that clients had specified. Contrary to their guarantee,
several women received sperm from the same man raising the possibility of subsequent
unwitting incestuous sexual relations. Sperm samples must be used within the hour
but some arrived late, often cold and in one astonishing case the flask also contained
coffee. Confidential rules were infringed when donors name and addresses were still
attached to the flask. Alarmingly, clients may have been exposed to AIDS and other
sexual diseases due to the lack of effective health screening. Former salesman, Mike
Black, observed, ‘I am sorry I ever got involved. Our customers were desperate to
have babies and we exploited them. There is a good chance some will have babies that
are different from what they wanted and several might even be in danger.’
A midwife who worked as a volunteer with the firm confessed it was just a money making machine, but it was sold as a crusade on behalf of lesbians who were sometimes referred to as ‘dykes’ by Gonzalez. Several politicians now feel the Government should take urgent action. Apart from the important ethical, medical and hygiene considerations, this has to be an abuse of the procreative process.
Gonzalez is not, however, without competition. Another sperm selling business 'SpermDirect' created in 2005 amply shows that lesbians and others have ready spare cash for anonymous sperm. Run by Nigel Woodforth, 38, a printer repair engineer with no medical qualifications, it is exploiting the law by selling 'fresh' sperm and guaranteeing donor anonymity by destroying their records after twelve months.
Boasting a prestigious address in Mayfair, London, the business is actually run from a dingy office in an industrial and commercial unit in Reading. Clients are charged a £50 registration fee and at £400 a sample, it could take several attempts before a woman is inseminated. This could involve an outlay of several thousand pounds. Mr. Woodforth has acknowledged that the samples will not be 100 percent viral free but believes the risks are minimal.
Dr. Allan Pacey, Secretary of the British Fertility Society and a Professor of Andrology
at the University of Sheffield wants the law tightened-
Meanwhile, Suzi Leather, head of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, has added her voice to the demand for a change in legislation requiring doctors to assess the '...need of the child for a father'. She thinks it unnecessary and observes, "I don't think there should be an age limit . . . I don't think that either being lesbian or being a single woman should rule you out of fertility treatment. Any rules that inhibit lesbians or singles are 'anachronistic'. Leather is motivated by concern that the human rights of lesbians and single women are being violated following the changes to the adoption law and the creation of civil partnerships. We can conclude that she is less concerned with the human rights of the unborn child. It is fair to ask if she has an agenda, because active Australian feminists and lesbians are currently seeking the same right to extend IVF treatment to lesbian and single mothers. They also think the role of a father is redundant.
Homosexuals exaggerate the incidence of public violence against themselves as another
vehicle for gaining public compassion. But early British research suggests that one
in four gay relationships result in domestic problems. It can involve a cycle of
abuse that may be physical, emotional, sexual or even financial. The reason for the
abuse is power and control. But there are additional unique forms of abuse associated
with same-
Knowing something about the quality of homosexual relationships might help us understand
why same-
A further study on the 'Prevalence of Domestic Violence Among Lesbians and Gay Men'.
by Sigma Research (March 2003), opened a can of worms regarding the quality of same-
The percentage of lesbians and gay men who suffered fell into several categories
of abuse. For example, sexually abused or forced to have sex -
Writing for the Fyne Times, Natalie Thorne claims that gay domestic violence is an issue that has been swept under the carpet. She claims that gays are obsessed with homophobic attacks and how ‘outsiders’ are violent towards gays, but in reality it is violence within the gay community that is a far bigger issue. According to Dee Shelly of GLAM '...A lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered person cannot walk down the street hand in hand with their partner, without fear of verbal abuse or the chance of being physically attacked. Consequently, the home is seen as a place of safety, a haven in a homophobic world, but if you are a victim of same sex domestic abuse your home is the most dangerous place you can be.'
With such revelations of abuse coming from the homosexual community itself, it's
hardly surprising that so few gays and lesbians enter into a same-
Since homosexuals have increased numbers of partners and breakups, compared with heterosexuals it is hardly surprising if suicide attempts are proportionally increased. Perhaps it is coincidence but the median number of partners for homosexuals is four times higher than for heterosexuals and a good general rule of thumb is that suicide attempts are similarly about three times higher.
Another factor in suicide attempts would be the compulsive or addictive elements in homosexuality, with addiction itself leading to feelings of depression because the lifestyle is out of control. There are some, (as many as 50 percent of young men today), who take no precautions against HIV who have considerable addictive problems, and this also feeds into suicide attempts.
Homosexuality and the Media
The entertainment business like the fashion world, though always a haven for homosexual activity, are now at the forefront in pushing the case for the normalisation of behaviour that was more commonly hidden in the dressing room closet. Elizabeth Taylor is reported to have commented that Hollywood would not have existed without homosexuality. Leading entertainment stars flamboyantly proclaim their gayness and donate millions of pounds in the fight against AIDS. In the America media, especially, many leading homosexuals occupy positions of considerable influence.
Over the last few years, British television has been inundated with homosexual material.
Channel 4, in particular, has been at the forefront in presenting salacious gay scenes
in competition for viewers. 'Shed Productions', a leading production company established
in 1998 and run entirely by homosexuals are regular purveyors of smut involving brutality
and kinky sex. They also produced 'Bad Girls' and 'Footballers' Wives' and have contributed
to the popular soaps by adding gay lesbian and transgender storylines. Soon to appear
is yet another drama about supposed widespread homosexuality in the army. In the
meantime, former boss at Channel 4, Michael Grade, a brash, aggressive populist,
who opened the floodgates to trash television earning the reputation of ‘Pornographer-
British television has also imported American sitcoms. 'Will & Grace', for example
regularly promotes homosexuality and explicit sex-
In France, Pink TV was recently launched which is the first gay television station
which aims to make gay culture mainstream. It promises a mixture of Wonder Women
repeats, prime-
Meanwhile, here at home, a new TV guide targeting lesbian and gay viewers has been
launched. Combining specially gay programmes with features that would be of interest
to gay viewer, LoveMyTv is looking to marry cult classics with gay movies, camp comedies
and lesbian documentaries. It follows a growth of gay specific television in the
past 12 months, with gay characters gradually appearing in mainstream soaps and other
programmes. Despite complaints from a minority of its audience, Coronation Street
introduced the first gay kiss in its 43-
AIDS -
Homosexual are anxious that you believe that AIDS; a modern disease; is not strictly confined to their own community and that it is equally relevant to heterosexual society. In one sense, of course, this is true on the basis it is a communicable disease. But in another, it is misleading since heterosexual men and women become infected with the disease through contact with homosexual and bisexual men. The aetiology of AIDS is with homosexuals and it does not require a degree in medicine to understand that if they abstained from penetrative anal sexual behaviour then the disease would soon wither and likely cease.
In substance, the transmission history of the HIV/AIDS infection into the heterosexual community leads right back to homosexual and bisexual men. HIV entered the USA during the late 1960s. Homosexual strategists Kirk and Pill acknowledged the source of the virus, 'As the virus leaks out of homosexual circles and into the rest of society, we need have no illusions...' It then spread throughout the homosexual community in America and Europe before finally engulfing Africa and the rest of the world,
In a study on AIDS in 1983 involving Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland and the UK it was found that the most important contributor to the AIDS epidemic in Europe were male homosexuals. Homosexual men are a thousand times more likely to contract AIDS than the general male heterosexual population. The risk of HIV infection from anal intercourse is extremely high: for men it is at least 2700 times the risk from vaginal intercourse. And at one time, men who have ever engaged in any homosexual sex are banned for life from giving blood in the UK, even if it was “safe sex” with a condom. This reflects, does it not, the notion there is no such thing as 'safe sex' when it comes to homosexuals? The risk of anal cancer soars by nearly 4,000% for men who have sex with men. And we have already mentioned Tatchell's plea for more medical resources to deal with an increasing prevalence of anal cancer in homosexual and bisexual men.
According to WHO, up to the year 2000, nearly 22 million people have died of AIDS from the time it was first identified, leaving about 14 million orphaned children in its wake. The US National Intelligence Council now predict that by 2010 there will be 50 to 75 million people with HIV in just five countries of the world – Russia, India, China, Nigeria and Ethiopia. This eclipses the 30 to 35 million cases predicted for 2010 in what is currently the focal point of the pandemic, central and southern Africa
Writing in 2003, John McKellar, a prominent Canadian homosexual observed, '.... we
were confronted with the most easily preventable, difficult to acquire, behaviourally
caused, fatal disease in the history of humankind -
Bug Chasers
Shocking, is the evidence that homosexuals sometimes indulge in extremely destructive behaviour and actively seek to acquire AIDS in order to pass it on. Thus, 'bug chasers' and 'bare backing' has been identified whereby homosexual men deliberately indulge in repetitive unprotected anal intercourse with multiple partners because the 'HIV negative' homosexual world is defined by fear, but the 'positive' is defined by pleasure. Positive gayness is true liberation! However, because it has political and financial implications, the homosexual lobby would rather you didn't know about this.
The 2004 April issue of the Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome revealed
that practices such as 'gifting' and 'bug chasing' -
Sexual health experts are now calling for a crackdown on websites that are helping
to fuel a worrying rise in new infections. Sex between men accounted for almost a
third of new cases of HIV last year, with 1,414 recorded. Professor Graham Hart,
another leading expert, told a recent international conference: 'There are changes
happening in some gay men's sexual cultures around the world. There are sexual micro-
Can the gay community really claim a level of respectability and be fully accepted
by the wider community? Are annual Gay Parades an affirmation they have successfully
arrived, or an additional manifestation of insecurity and ambivalence? How then do
we account for reprehensible behaviour associated with parades in America? This question
is posed because what happens in America usually follows elsewhere? What are we to
make of public whippings, body piercing, public sex, sado-
In America right now, Gay Parades can rely on police protection even as homosexuals
appear semi or completely nude whilst simulating homosexual sex acts and demand rights
for paedophiles like the North American Man-
McKellar, again, 'The dictionary defines pride as, 'inordinate self esteem, an overweening opinion of one's own qualities and attainments that give rise to superiority over and contempt for others'. (Ha! it is any wonder that the gay lobby has designated this word as it's chief mascot?) Pride is also one of the seven deadly sins; it's destructive and divisive; it's the cause of most wars; it's responsible for the spread of AIDS.'
A homosexual is entitled to the same civil rights as every other citizen -
And why were the homosexuals lobby recently so intent on the removal of Section 28 when it did not prevent a local authority from the legitimate discussion of homosexuality or prevent the counselling of pupils who are being bullied? The answer is simple! It prevented a local authority from ‘promoting a homosexual lifestyle’ as a 'pretended' family relationship in schools and elsewhere. Now that restriction has gone, watch out for homosexual lobby groups springing up to counsel kids about homophobia under the guise of wishing to protect 'gay' school kids from being bullied.
One leading homosexual has admitted. 'You quickly discover that the optimum way to ensure future supporters to your cause and ideology is through the minds of the young. You skillfully master the techniques of invoking sympathy, hiding the truth and presenting a sanitized portrait of gay life. Introducing kindergarten and grade one students to alternative behaviours and lifestyles is psychological pedophilia. You don't have to engage solely in physical contact to molest a child. You can diddle with their minds and their emotions. And this is exactly what some of my radical brothers and sisters are up to.'
The outcome of homosexuality is best understood as a very complex state of confusion
over sexual identity. In other words most sexual confusion in school children clears
away if left to itself. It's just a passing phase! What's the evidence for this?
Well, the National Health and Social Life survey across America in 1994; the best
evidence so far available; indicates that eight percent of 16-
If left to itself, most sexual confusion in children clears away. This is another good reason from prohibiting gay counselling or curricula at schools.
A Way of Death
We need to understand what kinds of behaviour homosexual and lesbians indulge in. Equally, we should also examine what consequence this has on them and society at large. There's an abundance of information, scientific and otherwise, out there on the Internet.
Some of the facts do not make for pleasant reading and you may even be embarrassed to learn of a repugnant repertoire of human behaviour. But sexuality is one of mankind's strongest, most enduring and compelling forces. Is it right to proceed on the contradictory basis that homosexuality, bisexualism and lesbianism are highly enjoyable and fulfilling experiences that enrich the total sum of human experience as they claim? Andrew Sullivan the HIV+ homosexual and Sunday Times columnist distressingly notes that death in the gay community is less an event than an environment. He remarks, 'Gay life and gay death are not separate issues, meeting occasionally at the bedside or the grave. They are wedded to each other.' For immediate evidence of this visit any of the thousands of queer websites. Most if not all, carefully provide easy access to additional health information on AIDS/HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases. It's an important preoccupation of the lifestyle. In fact, homosexuality is not a lifestyle, it's a deathstyle!
We need to be sympathetic and compassionate in our dealings with homosexual men and women. At the same time we urgently need to take a much more pragmatic view of the ubiquitous and consistent evidence that describes and explains homosexual behaviour. They in turn have to recognise that rehabilitation is possible and that many thousands of homosexuals have gone on to enjoy traditional family experiences.
Homosexuals are deeply wounded people who are trying to change society because they refuse or are afraid of dealing with their own problem. They suggest that gay marriage is an affirmation of their rightful place in society, but it will further lock them into unhealthy attitudes and behaviour. It will also deny children at risk for same sex attraction the help they need. Those who claim that compassion requires the elimination of prejudice and discrimination are not offering freedom but a more comfortable bondage.
If you come upon a man chained to a tree -
The debate here is not about the persecution of the homosexual minority though that is exactly how the gay lobby will define it. It is about the state's duty to regulate against lifestyles that are harmful and unhealthy. The purpose of the law is to discriminate against certain activities in order to protect society from any potential adverse consequences.
The law discriminates against those who drink and drive, parents who are cruel to their children, companies who produce dangerous products, citizens who evade taxes, incompetent lawyers and doctors and governments that exceed their power. Single people and unmarried couples are discriminated against by the benefits granted to married couples. At present British law still discriminates against homosexual behaviour in certain circumstances, even if this has been greatly circumscribed by what some would see as excessively tolerant human rights legislation.
Why should some homosexuals complain about discrimination when they practice it themselves?
They actively shun the company of heterosexual people, yet complain when the process
is reversed. The gay agenda is manifestly sexist which discriminates grievously against
our historically established heterosexual culture. But more, the foundation of the
homosexual agenda is based upon lies, deceit and when necessary -
In the UK we are already witnessing the discriminating downside of gay power now
enshrined in law. Anti-
Renowned journalist and social commentator, Melanie Phillips has rightly pointed
out that British values are under siege. She observes, ‘The freest and most tolerant
society on earth now leads the way in intimidation, moral degradation and lies.’
We face a grotesque situation where conventional lifestyles are not tolerated. Gays
rights are supposed to be about tolerance, but in truth it is intolerant of the traditional
family. Public debate and policy-
Copyright | Contact Us | Top | Next